Skip to content
Mymichigan Health at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Mymichigan Health

Creating healthy communities - together

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$121kPhilanthropy$52kRecreation & Sports$51kCommunity Improvement$21kHuman Services$18kCrime & Legal$18kFood & Nutrition$14kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $105,357, the rows itemized in this filing. The $207,577 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $102,220 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $68k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDTN$31,500
UNITED WAY$14,425
GREATER MIDLAND COMMNTY$11,640
FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES$10,000
THE SUNSET PROJECT$9,000
SUNRISE CENTRE$9,000
GRATIOT COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION$7,500
CMU PUBLIC BROADCASTNG NETWORK$6,292
MICHIGAN BASEBALL FOUNDATION INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $16k → 14%ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $14k → 16%WEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER: $8k → 19%SUNSET PROJECT: $10k → 16%THE SUNSET PROJECT: $9k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$132k · 4 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$132k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
0%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $45k · revenue +43%
  • GM
    GREATER MIDLAND COMMUNITY CTRS INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue -13%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $33k · revenue -81%

Funded once

  • GL
    GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue -8%
  • MC
    Midland County Cancer Society DBA Cancer Services
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +0%
  • AA
    ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $14k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
2
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
3
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
4
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
5
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
6
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
7
Macomb County Chamber of Commerce

The organization's mission is to promote a healthy business climate for its members and all businesses in macomb county, michigan.

Unclassified
8
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
9
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
10
West Michigan Cancer Center

Wmcc strives to provide compassionate and innovative care to achieve the best possible outcomes and quality of life for our patients.

Health
11
West Central Community Action

In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Midland Family Center; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
6/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Heart Association Inc: $44,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $33,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCSUNRISE CENTRE INC: $9,000 · HealthSUNRISE CENTRE INCTHE SUNSET PROJECT: $19,000 · Human ServicesTHE SUNSET PROJECTGREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $15,681 · Human ServicesGREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATIO…ALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZE…Family & Children's Services of Mid-Michigan Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesFamily & Children's Servi…WEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER: $8,000 · Human ServicesWEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTE…Midland County Cancer Society DBA Cancer Services: $15,000 · OtherMidland County Cancer So…United Way of Midland County: $14,425 · OtherUnited Way of Midland Co…HARRISON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS ALL-SPORTS BOOSTERS INC: $10,000 · OtherHARRISON COMMUNITY SCHOO…GRATIOT COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION: $7,500 · OtherGRATIOT COUNTY CHILD ADV…CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $6,292 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERS…ROSCOMMON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $6,200 · OtherROSCOMMON COUNTY UNITED …MT PLEASANT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,500 · OtherMT PLEASANT CHAMBER OF C…GREATER MIDLAND COMMUNITY CTRS INC: $35,140 · Recreation & SportsGREATER MIDLA…MIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $31,500 · PhilanthropyMIDLAND ARE…WOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalMICHIGAN BASEBALL FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Community Improvement
Health$86,500Human Services$66,681Other$64,917Recreation & Sports$35,140Philanthropy$31,500Crime & Legal$10,000Community Improvement$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $44,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIDLAND COMMUNITY CTRS INC: $35,140 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $33,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $31,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SUNSET PROJECT: $19,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetGREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $15,681 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMidland County Cancer Society DBA Cancer Services: $15,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUnited Way of Midland County: $14,425 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALPENA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $14,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRATIOT COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy Foun…The Patricia and Davi…The Herbert H & Grace…Midland Area Communit…The Charles J Strosac…Rollin M Gerstacker F…Laura Ludington Holle…Bill and Linda Stavro…United Way of Midland…Harry a and Margaret …Michigan Health Endow…The Doan Family Found…
Consumers Energy FoundationMI25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · The Patricia and David Kepler Foundation · The Herbert H & Grace a Dow Foundation · Midland Area Community Foundation · The Charles J Strosacker Foundation · Rollin M Gerstacker Foundation · Laura Ludington Hollenbeck Foundation · Bill and Linda Stavropoulos Family Foundation · United Way of Midland County · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Doan Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mymichigan Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mymichigan Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mymichigan Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home