Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bill and Linda Stavropoulos Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$919k
Granted FY2023
26
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$400k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

54% of Bill and Linda Stavropoulos Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Bill and Linda Stavropoulos Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 18 organizations, $919k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
17
9
18
11
19
6
20
15
21
19
22
18
23
13
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$8.0MArts & Culture$1.1MRecreation & Sports$300kCommunity Improvement$206kPhilanthropy$124kReligion$100kHealth$90kSocial Science$65kHuman Services$51kOther$607k
02FY2023 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k17 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $354k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$400,000
MIDLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS$200,250
GREATER MIDLAND COMMUNITY CENTER$100,000
ST KATHERNINE GREEK ORTH$54,000
MI BASEBALL FDN$40,000
ARTIS-NAPLES$25,000
NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY$22,500
UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND COUNTY$20,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$20,000
NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY$7,500
CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY NAPLES$5,000
FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADAMY$5,000
ST DEMETRIOS GREEK ORTH$5,000
THE NAPLES PLAYERS$5,000
LEGACY CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SUCCESS$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION: $500 → 10%Christ Child Society Naples: $6k → 10%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY NAPLES: $5k → 10%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY NAPLES: $5k → 10%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY NAPLES: $5k → 10%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY NAPLES: $5k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $250 → 10%SHELTERHOUSE: $500 → 9%INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY LIVING: $500 → 9%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADAMY: $5k → 10%ADOPTION OPTION: $5k → 9%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADAMY: $1k → 10%SHELTERHOUSE: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 27 repeat orgs$327k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
40

Total granted

$3.6M
$262k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+42%

Still filing today

63%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    Fordham University
    4× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +31%
  • MC
    Midland Center for the Arts Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $700k · revenue +85%
  • AI
    ARTIS-NAPLES INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $345k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • EP
    Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -77%
  • MH
    MYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +110%
  • TO
    THE OPHTHALMOLOGY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +107%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
5
The Cardiac Institute

Our mission is to help people to live longer, healthier lives with dignity, and to use all of our resources to give them everything they expect and deserve in comprehensive cardiovascular care for their families and themselves.

Health
6
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
7
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
8
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
9
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

We, trinity health grand haven hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity health grand haven hospital is a member of trinity…

Health
10
Covenant Medical Center Inc

To provide diverse medical care to meet the heatlh care needs of the 14 counties in east central michigan we serve.

Health
11
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
12
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midland Area Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Tri-Star Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesHealth Access Advocacy and …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Elementary Literacy TutoringChristian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Cancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%16%10–20yr14%20%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr23%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr14%1%20–35yr13%69%35–55yr23%27%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/49
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,946

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
33/46
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac — $6,502,894 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacFordham University — $1,245,470 · EducationFordham University+5 more — $212,340 · EducationMidland Center for the Arts Inc — $700,250 · Arts & CultureMidland Cen…ARTIS-NAPLES INC — $345,000 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLE…+1 more — $12,500 · Arts & CultureUnited Way of Midland County — $155,000 · OtherST KATHERNINE GREEK ORTH — $150,500 · OtherGREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF THE — $62,200 · OtherNCH Center for Philanthropy — $37,500 · OtherBascom Palmer Eye Institute — $30,000 · OtherMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $65,000 · OtherCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NAPLES INC — $37,700 · OtherGLOBAL COMPASSION INC — $50,000 · Other+55 more — $174,850 · OtherGREATER MIDLAND COMMUNITY CTRS INC — $300,000 · Recreation & SportsMICHIGAN BASEBALL FOUNDATION INC — $186,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $20,000 · Community ImprovementMIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $116,000 · Philanthropy+5 more — $8,250 · PhilanthropyEcumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc — $100,000 · Religion+1 more — $250 · Religion
Education$7,960,704Arts & Culture$1,057,750Other$812,750Recreation & Sports$300,000Community Improvement$206,000Philanthropy$124,250Religion$100,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $6,502,894 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFordham University — $1,245,470 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMidland Center for the Arts Inc — $700,250 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC — $345,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER MIDLAND COMMUNITY CTRS INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNorthwood University — $200,090 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN BASEBALL FOUNDATION INC — $186,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetUnited Way of Midland County — $155,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $116,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetEcumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL COMPASSION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NAPLES INC — $37,700 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetTHE OPHTHALMOLOGY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAPLES PLAYERS INC — $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC — $6,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetADOPTION OPTION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLegacy Center for Community Success — $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-STAR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAVINS GOT HEART INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMYMICHIGAN HEALTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetReece Endeavor of Midland — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndependent Community Living Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND KIDS FIRST — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidland's Open Door — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds Fordham University
  • Who funds Midland Center for the Arts Inc
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC
  • Who funds GREATER MIDLAND COMMUNITY CTRS INC
  • Who funds Northwood University
  • Who funds MICHIGAN BASEBALL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds United Way of Midland County
  • Who funds MIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
  • Who funds GLOBAL COMPASSION INC
  • Who funds MYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NAPLES INC
  • Who funds THE OPHTHALMOLOGY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds THE NAPLES PLAYERS INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC
  • Who funds Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc
  • Who funds ADOPTION OPTION INC
  • Who funds Legacy Center for Community Success
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TRI-STAR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Midland Area Community FoundationMI38.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Midland Area Community Foundation · The Patricia and David Kepler Foundation · The Charles J Strosacker Foundation · Bierlein Companies Foundation · The Herbert H & Grace a Dow Foundation · The Doan Family Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Ludington Family Foundation · Rollin M Gerstacker Foundation · Chemical Bank Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Mymichigan Health

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bill and Linda Stavropoulos Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Hoops and Homework Inc5% of income from government
  • Christ Child Society of Naples Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph