· Private foundation
Mustang Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k21 grants · $421k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+7 grants · $4.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROUNDABOUT THEATER COMPANY | $1,300,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER MONMOUTH COUNTY | $1,000,000 |
| MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA | $625,000 |
| GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE | $450,000 |
| FIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION | $350,000 |
| OMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC STUDIES | $300,000 |
| WHARTON INSTITUTE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $250,000 |
| THE CLIMATE MUSEUM | $200,000 |
| GLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC | $150,000 |
| PATH HOME | $140,000 |
| LUNCH BREAK | $100,000 |
| BRICK CITY KITTIES RESCUE | $80,000 |
| COUNT BASIE THEATRE | $75,000 |
| BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $580k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RTROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC3× · 2023–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +21%
- MCMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA3× · 2023–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +32%
- YOYMCA OF GREATER MONMOUTH COUNTY INC2× · 2023–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +44%
Funded once
- JOJUSTICE OUTSIDEone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +17%
- OTOregon Tradeswomen Incone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -17%
- LELITTLE ESSENTIALSone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Our mission is to equip women and non-binary folks to thrive in product management careers at all levels. we want all people to have equitable opportunities to build rewarding careers and shape the products of the future.
Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nontoxic Certified Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF GREATER MONMOUTH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD ↗
- Who funds FIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE WHARTON INSTITUTE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds OMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds PATH HOME ↗
- Who funds LUNCH BREAK INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM A NJ NONPROFIT CO ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds BRICK CITY KITTIES RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds COUNT BASIE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ADELANTE MUJERES ↗
- Who funds BLOOM WHERE PLANTED ↗
- Who funds EVERY WOMAN TREATY INC ↗
- Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Soup Kitchen 411 Inc ↗
- Who funds Citta Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Creative Growth Art Center ↗
- Who funds LUV MICHAEL INC ↗
- Who funds Bradley Angle ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM'S BE YOURSELF CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds WORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds CHESS-IN-THE-SCHOOLS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Oregon Community Foundation · New Jersey Natural Gas Company Charity Inc · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Ford Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Star Mooring Foundation Inc · Ninety-Nine Girlfriends
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mustang Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Elso Inc — 100% of income from government
- Soup Kitchen 411 Inc — 55% of income from government
- Oregon Tradeswomen Inc — 46% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
- Gather Make Shelter — 7% of income from government
- Lunch Break Inc — 4% of income from government
- Count Basie Theatre Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mustang Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mustang Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.