Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mustang Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$146k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$380kArts & Culture$292kHuman Services$90kFood & Nutrition$84kCrime & Legal$83kHealth$30kRecreation & Sports$21kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $82k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURLESON HIGHER EDUCATION FUND$16,500
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF JOHNSON CNTY$12,500
MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC$12,500
JOHNSON COUNTY APPLES COALITION$10,000
JUMPSTART$10,000
EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
HOPE INC$10,000
CLEBURNE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION$6,000
SOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY$3,000
BLINN COLLEGE$2,500
WICHITA FALLS UNIVERSITY$2,500
OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
HILL COLLEGE$2,500
BLINN COLLEGE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $13k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $13k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $10k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $4k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $3k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $3k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $3k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $2k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $2k → 10%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 10%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 10%EAST CLBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 10%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 10%EAST CLEBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 10%EAST CLBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 10%EAST CLBURNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $250 → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $250 → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $250 → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $250 → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
CA
AZ
KS
AR
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$917k · 41 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
30

Total granted

$917k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

39%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    East Cleburne Community Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +35%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +42%
  • HI
    HOPE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • RV
    RIO VISTA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $22k
  • RC
    Rotary Club of Cleburne Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -63%
  • OS
    OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
2
Johnson City Community Education Foundation

To provide lbj students financial support for continuing higher education.

Education
3
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
4
Clarendon College Foundation Inc

Clarendon college foundation, inc. is organized to support and promote the interest of education at clarendon college and to assist and extend financial support to clarendon college.

Education
5
Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education
6
Clear Creek Baptist Bible College Inc

Private Baptist College

—
7
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
8
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
9
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
10
Crawford-Zbanek Scholarship Foundation Inc

Award college scholarships

Education
11
Central Christian University Inc

Central christian university inc is a christian academic institution with the primary mission of providing quality christian education.

Education
12
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abilene Christian University; the most unlike its peers is Casa of Johnson County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAYLAND MUSEUM: $248,449 · OtherLAYLAND MUSEUMHILL COLLEGE: $94,419 · OtherHILL COLLEGECHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF JOHNSON CNTY: $77,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF JOHNSON CNTYIndividual grant recipient: $35,500 · OtherJOHNSON COUNTY APPLES COALITION: $32,800 · Other+56 more: $297,019 · Other+56 moreEast Cleburne Community Center: $52,500 · Human ServicesEast Clebur…MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $50,250 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WH…+1 more: $2,250 · Human ServicesBURLESON HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNI: $33,000 · EducationCLEBURNE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · EducationCHAMPION CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC: $3,000 · EducationHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · Education+2 more: $2,500 · EducationHOPE INC: $29,750 · Crime & LegalCASA of Johnson County Inc: $5,200 · Crime & LegalTexas Health Resources Foundation: $21,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthJOHNSON COUNTY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsBRAZOS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE IMAGINATION STATION: $1,000 · Arts & CultureJOHNS TEXAS YOUTH RESCUE: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$785,687Human Services$105,000Education$66,500Crime & Legal$34,950Health$21,500Recreation & Sports$4,000Arts & Culture$4,000Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEast Cleburne Community Center: $52,500 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $50,250 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBURLESON HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNI: $33,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetHOPE INC: $29,750 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEBURNE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY: $10,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER: $8,150 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION BLESSING OF JOHNSON CO INC: $8,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE ASSEMBLY INC: $7,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetCASA of Johnson County Inc: $5,200 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRotary Club of Cleburne Inc: $5,060 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetJOHNSON COUNTY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetBRAZOS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $3,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCHAMPION CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $2,250 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetCLEBURNE CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IMAGINATION STATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGORDON COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCleburne Chamber of Commerce: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATHENA SOCIETY OF BURLESON: $500 over 5y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds East Cleburne Community Center ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BURLESON HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNI ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CLEBURNE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CLEBURNE PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BLESSING OF JOHNSON CO INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE ASSEMBLY INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Johnson County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Cleburne Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSON COUNTY HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPION CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Hazlewood Barkley Foundation · Texas Health Huguley Inc · Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mustang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mustang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Gordon College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mustang Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mustang Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mustang’s filings →

More from the funding graph