Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mulago Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23M
Granted FY2024still arriving
97
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$62MEnvironment$32MHealth$25MEducation$8.7MFood & Nutrition$8.6MPhilanthropy$3.8MCommunity Improvement$3.4MYouth Development$3.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $3.0M
  • $250k+65 grants · $20M
$250,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$358M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HEALTHY CHILDREN INC$500,000
BRIDGES TO PROSPERITY$500,000
INTELEHEALTH INC$500,000
THE LUMINOS FUND$500,000
ABSOLUTE RETURN FOR KIDS$500,000
LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$500,000
DIGITAL GREEN FOUNDATION$500,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
PANORAMA GLOBAL$500,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC$500,000
ACELI AFRICA INC$500,000
NOORA HEALTH$250,000
VISION SPRING$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 70% of grant dollars ($113M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 30% that went abroad ($50M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD LANDS INC: $50k → 24%EDWARDS CHARLES FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%SAVELIFE FOUNDATION USA: $500k → 17%SAVELIFE FOUNDATION: $250k → 17%SOCIAL FINANCE: $485k → 16%SOCIAL FINANCE: $450k → 16%SAVELIFE FOUNDATION: $250k → 17%SOCIAL FINANCE: $300k → 16%SOCIAL FINANCE: $250k → 16%TOUCH FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 30% of all-years giving ($50M)

40 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$11M · 44 grants
India$8.6M · 45 grants
Kenya$5.5M · 30 grants
South Africa$3.6M · 22 grants
Rwanda$3.0M · 15 grants
Zambia$2.3M · 8 grants
Colombia$1.9M · 10 grants
Tanzania$1.8M · 9 grants
Botswana$1.5M · 5 grants
Brazil$1.3M · 12 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141M · 170 repeat orgs$21M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +110% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

170 repeat relationships: 66 still active in FY2024, 104 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

170
141

Total granted

$141M
$17M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
+49%

Still filing today

41%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3.0M · revenue +123%
  • IH
    Integrate Health Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +674%
  • PG
    PANORAMA GLOBAL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +258%

Funded once

  • CE
    CONSERVATION EQUITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5.0M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
2
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
3
Well Aware Inc

Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.

International
4
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
5
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
6
Safe Water Network

Safe water network envisions a world with healthy, thriving communities managing their supply of safe water. our mission is to develop and scale-up innovative solutions, document best practices and build partnerships to reach millions with…

Environment
7
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
8
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
9
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
10
Water for Good

Water for good's mission is to transform lives through sustainable access to safe water as well as improved sanitation and hygiene in the places that need it most.

International
11
Splash International

The mission of Splash International and its subsidiaries is to ensure clean water for children. Splash partners with governments and local organizations to deliver sustainable water, sanitation, hygiene, and menstrual health programs in…

Environment
12
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Global Development Incubator Inc; the most unlike its peers is Manasseh's Children Dba Ujamaa-Africa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 340 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

18
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
116/118
Grantees still filing
85/118
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONSERVATION EQUITY FOUNDATION: $5,000,000 · OtherCONSERVATION EQUITY FOUNDATION+137 more: $73,315,360 · Other+137 morePANORAMA GLOBAL: $2,720,000 · InternationalPANORAMA GLOBALPROJECT HEALTHY CHILDREN INC: $2,550,000 · InternationalPROJECT HEALTHY CHILDR…MUSO INC: $2,475,000 · InternationalMUSO INCWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $1,850,000 · InternationalWORLD RESOURCES INSTIT…STRONGMINDS INC: $1,850,000 · InternationalSTRONGMINDS INCBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC: $1,850,000 · InternationalBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY …INTELEHEALTH INC: $1,800,000 · InternationalINTELEHEALTH INCLwala Community Alliance: $1,650,000 · InternationalLIVING GOODS: $1,600,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUND: $1,500,000 · InternationalPRECISION DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,250,000 · InternationalPIVOT WORKS INC: $1,250,000 · InternationalEDUCATE GIRLS: $1,250,000 · InternationalSEMILLA NUEVA: $1,250,000 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC: $1,180,000 · International+13 more: $5,255,000 · International+13 moreNIA TERO FOUNDATION: $10,000,000 · EnvironmentNIA TERO FOU…CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,050,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION…SAHA GLOBAL INC: $1,250,000 · EnvironmentSAHA GLOBAL …MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC: $1,250,000 · EnvironmentMALIASILI IN…PLANET INDONESIA: $600,000 · Environment+3 more: $685,000 · EnvironmentIntegrate Health Inc: $2,825,000 · HealthIntegrate H…NEXLEAF ANALYTICS: $2,350,000 · HealthNEXLEAF ANA…NOORA HEALTH: $2,325,000 · HealthNOORA HEALT…LAST MILE HEALTH: $2,250,000 · HealthLAST MILE H…AMANI GLOBAL WORKS: $1,650,000 · HealthAMANI GLOBA…MEDIC MOBILE INC: $1,300,000 · HealthMEDIC MOBIL…YOUNG 1OVE FOUNDATION: $775,000 · Health+7 more: $1,900,000 · Health+7 moreVILLAGEREACH: $2,250,000 · EducationLUMINOS FUND: $2,000,000 · EducationDIGITAL GREEN FOUNDATION: $1,900,000 · EducationDost Education: $1,150,000 · EducationWITHIN REACH INC: $350,000 · EducationRocket Learning Foundation: $350,000 · EducationSocial Finance Inc: $1,484,500 · Human ServicesSAVELIFE FOUNDATION USA: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesTOUCH HEALTH INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesVISIONSPRING INC: $2,143,000 · PhilanthropyPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $175,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Philanthropy
Other$78,315,360International$31,280,000Environment$16,835,000Health$15,375,000Education$8,000,000Human Services$2,584,500Philanthropy$2,418,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNIA TERO FOUNDATION: $10,000,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,050,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetIntegrate Health Inc: $2,825,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $2,720,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetPROJECT HEALTHY CHILDREN INC: $2,550,000 over 8y, 20% of budgetMUSO INC: $2,475,000 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetNEXLEAF ANALYTICS: $2,350,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetNOORA HEALTH: $2,325,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetVILLAGEREACH: $2,250,000 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetLAST MILE HEALTH: $2,250,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetHEALTHY LEARNERS INC: $2,150,000 over 8y, 40% of budgetVISIONSPRING INC: $2,143,000 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetLUMINOS FUND: $2,000,000 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetDIGITAL GREEN FOUNDATION: $1,900,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $1,850,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetIMAGINE WORLDWIDE: $1,850,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetSTRONGMINDS INC: $1,850,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC: $1,850,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetINTELEHEALTH INC: $1,800,000 over 5y, 60% of budgetLwala Community Alliance: $1,650,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetAMANI GLOBAL WORKS: $1,650,000 over 8y, 36% of budgetLIVING GOODS: $1,600,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $1,500,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSocial Finance Inc: $1,484,500 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetNO MEANS NO WORLDWIDE: $1,350,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetMEDIC MOBILE INC: $1,300,000 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetPRECISION DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,250,000 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetPIVOT WORKS INC: $1,250,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetEDUCATE GIRLS: $1,250,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetSAHA GLOBAL INC: $1,250,000 over 6y, 38% of budgetMYAGRO FARMS: $1,250,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetMALIASILI INITIATIVES INC: $1,250,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetSEMILLA NUEVA: $1,250,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC: $1,180,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetDost Education: $1,150,000 over 6y, 43% of budgetSAVELIFE FOUNDATION USA: $1,000,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetROOT CAPITAL INC: $900,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetYOUNG 1OVE FOUNDATION: $775,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetUBONGO INTERNATIONAL: $750,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetPLANET INDONESIA: $600,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetMASS DESIGN GROUP LTD: $550,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetImpactMatters Inc: $533,620 over 2y, 45% of budgetID INSIGHT INC: $525,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC: $500,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetEARTHENABLE INC: $500,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetSANERGY INC: $500,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetACELI AFRICA INC: $500,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetThe Nudge Foundation: $350,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NIA TERO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Integrate Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALTHY CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSO INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXLEAF ANALYTICS ↗
  • Who funds NOORA HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGEREACH ↗
  • Who funds LAST MILE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY LEARNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds VISIONSPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds LUMINOS FUND ↗
  • Who funds DIGITAL GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds STRONGMINDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds INTELEHEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Lwala Community Alliance ↗
  • Who funds AMANI GLOBAL WORKS ↗
  • Who funds LIVING GOODS ↗
  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Social Finance Inc ↗
  • Who funds NO MEANS NO WORLDWIDE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rippleworks IncCA66.3× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rippleworks Inc · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Skoll Fund · Gates Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · The Skoll Foundation · The Iroh Foundation (Fka Ra5 Foundation) · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Sall Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Segal Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mulago Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mulago Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Social Finance Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mulago Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mulago Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 340 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mulago’s filings →

More from the funding graph