Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mt Zion Lutheran Church Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$274kFood & Nutrition$92kHuman Services$24kRecreation & Sports$21kCommunity Improvement$9kEducation$8kHealth$8kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $66k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$502k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOVE FOR A CHILD$15,000
NIA PURPOSE FOR LIFE AGENCY$15,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$12,000
FAMILY OF GOD$12,000
SAMARTIAN HOUSE$12,000
LIVING WATERS MINISTRY$6,000
AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,972
SHEPHERDS OF THE LAKES LUTHERAN$4,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
GENISIS LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,500
HOLY FAITH CHURCH$1,820
SAINT JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,700
ST GEORGE LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
ST MARTIN LUTHERAN CHURCH$902
UNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$822
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAMARITAS: $5k → 21%MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%SAMARTIAN HOUSE: $12k → 10%SAMARTIAN HOUSE: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$312k · 32 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
38

Total granted

$312k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+19%

Still filing today

6%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    TIMOTHY LUTHERAN CHURCH
    5× · 2018–2024 · $30k
  • LW
    LIVING WATERS MINISTRY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k
  • SG
    ST GEORGE LUTHERAN CHURCH
    7× · 2017–2025 · $17k

Funded once

  • PL
    PILGRAM LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • GS
    GRACIOUS SAVIOUR LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • LW
    LIVING WATER MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Macomb County Habitat for Humanity Inc

Provide affordable housing for low income families.

—
2
United Community Housing Coalition

To help low-income residents in detroit and wayne county stay in their homes and strengthen their communities, through representation, support, and ownership. we believe that having a place to live is a basic human right, and are…

Housing & Shelter
3
Macomb Homeless Coalition

To act as an advocate for the homeless and potentially homeless in macomb county by collaborating efforts that promote and sustain self-sufficiency

—
4
Macomb County Humane Society

Provide care for homeless/abused animals

Animals
5
Samaritan Center Inc

Dedicated to working with other community organizations and institutions toward creating a community environment that supports the positive growth and development of all of its members.

Community Improvement
6
Macomb County Interfaith Volunteer Caregivers

Drawing from religious, business, civic and individual resources, the Interfaith Volunteer Caregivers program works to meet two mutually entwined and equally important purposes: to respond to the ever-growing needs of older and physically…

Human Services
7
Macomb County Warming Center

To provide assistance to homeless individuals

—
8
Covenant House Chicago
—
9
Macomb County Veterans Food Bank

The mission is to provide food to needy and/or homeless veterans of macomb county michigan

Food & Nutrition
10
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
11
Samaritan Homes Inc

Samaritan homes inc. seeks to provide affordable housing and residential services for all persons with physical, emotional, mental, developmental, learning, economic, and social disabilities including persons of low and moderate income.

Human Services
12
Mahaska County Habitat for Humanity

A nonprofit ecumenical christian housing ministry dedicated to eleminating substandard housing and homelessness worldwide and to making adequate, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Micah 6 Community; the most unlike its peers is Camp Cavell Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TIMOTHY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $29,500 · OtherTIMOTHY LUTHERAN CHURCHLIVING WATERS MINISTRY: $20,000 · OtherST GEORGE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $17,255 · OtherFAMILY OF GOD: $16,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherMATRIX HUMAN SERVICES: $15,200 · OtherNIA PURPOSE FOR LIFE AGENCY: $15,000 · OtherLOVE FOR A CHILD: $15,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $14,924 · OtherAMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $14,113 · OtherCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $13,780 · Other+57 more: $223,651 · Other+57 moreSAMARITAN HOUSE: $16,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAS: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Human ServicesMICAH 6 COMMUNITY: $5,000 · Community ImprovementGOOD SHEPHERD COALITION: $4,000 · Community ImprovementCAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMPASSION PREGNANCY CENTER: $4,000 · Health
Other$410,423Human Services$25,000Community Improvement$9,000Recreation & Sports$4,000Health$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMATRIX HUMAN SERVICES: $15,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD COALITION: $4,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCOMPASSION PREGNANCY CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MATRIX HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MICAH 6 COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAS ↗
  • Who funds CAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE MACOMB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD COALITION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mt Zion Lutheran Church Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mt Zion Lutheran Church Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mt Zion Lutheran Church’s filings →

    More from the funding graph