Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mt Roeschmore Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$305k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.9MEducation$881kPhilanthropy$410kHealth$201kEnvironment$108kHuman Services$67kHousing & Shelter$48kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $290k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $395k
  • $250k+1 grant · $305k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM$305,274
OPERA NORTH$126,230
UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS$112,028
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$102,906
MASCOMA COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE$53,851
AVA GALLERY & ART CENTER$46,429
NORTHERN STAGE$39,826
DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK$33,174
CLIF$30,193
NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO$17,500
NEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE$12,000
HANOVER CONSERVANCY$11,000
TOWN OF CANAAN - MEETING HOUSE$10,000
MATILDA JOSLYN GAGE FOUNDATION$10,000
THE FROST PLACE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 28 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
10

Total granted

$3.2M
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+10%

Still filing today

64%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTHERN STAGE COMPANY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $526k · revenue +289%
  • CG
    Community Gallery Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $440k · revenue +25%
  • ON
    OPERA NORTH
    4× · 2018–2025 · $387k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • LR
    LARISSA ROESCH CHARITABLE FUND AT SCHWAB CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • MF
    MATTIS-ROESCH FAMILY FUND AT FIDELITY CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • RF
    ROESCH FAMILY FUND AT FIDELITY CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vermont Public Co

Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.

Arts & Culture
2
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
The University of Vermont Medical Center

To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve by integrating patient care, education, and research in a caring environment.

Health
5
Plan Nh - the Foundation for Shaping the Built Environment

Plan nh, founded in 1989, has a mission to foster excellence in the planning, design and development of new hampshire's built environment. our membership is a multidisciplinary group of architects, engineers, landscape architects,…

—
6
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center

Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.

Health
7
The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College

Located in south hadley, massachusetts, mount holyoke college is a highly selective, nondenominational, residential, research liberal arts college for women that is gender-diverse and welcomes applications from female, transgender, and…

Education
8
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
9
The University of Vermont Health Network Medical Group Inc

Serve as the governing organization for physicians who are employed to provide clinical services to affiliated member hospitals (the "affiliated hospitals") of the university of vermont health network ("uvm health network").

Health
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Vermont Trails & Greenways Council

To promote trails and greenways and to ensure that people will always have access to the landscape of vermont.

Environment
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hanover Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
21/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHERN STAGE COMPANY: $526,317 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN STAGE COMPANYCommunity Gallery Inc: $440,101 · Arts & CultureCommunity Gallery IncOPERA NORTH: $386,716 · Arts & CultureOPERA NORTHAMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC: $343,274 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INCNEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureNEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INCNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC: $65,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTrustees of Dartmouth College: $394,562 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth Co…UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $336,748 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDSCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $101,358 · EducationCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUN…+2 more: $8,500 · EducationDARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK: $88,174 · OtherDARTMOUTH-HITCHCO…Individual grant recipient: $52,500 · OtherIndividual grant …LARISSA ROESCH CHARITABLE FUND AT SCHWAB CHARITABLE: $50,005 · OtherLARISSA ROESCH CH…MATTIS-ROESCH FAMILY FUND AT FIDELITY CHARITABLE: $50,005 · OtherMATTIS-ROESCH FAM…ROESCH FAMILY FUND AT FIDELITY CHARITABLE: $50,005 · OtherROESCH FAMILY FUN…GRAFTON SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $48,500 · OtherGRAFTON SENIOR CI…TWIN PINES HOUSING TRUST: $45,000 · OtherTWIN PINES HOUSIN…UNIVERSITY OF CA: $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CACLIF: $30,193 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherVINS: $25,234 · Other+19 more: $101,850 · Other+19 moreMATILDA JOSLYN GAGE FOUNDATION: $250,475 · Philanthropy+2 more: $5,500 · PhilanthropyMASCOMA COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC: $63,851 · HealthWEST CENTRAL SERVICES INC: $46,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthUPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $82,291 · EnvironmentHANOVER CONSERVANCY: $18,000 · EnvironmentNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · Environment+1 more: $300 · EnvironmentTHE PINE PARK ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFINDING OUR STRIDE: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$1,911,408Education$841,168Other$609,466Philanthropy$255,975Health$110,851Environment$108,091Recreation & Sports$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN STAGE COMPANY: $526,317 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetCommunity Gallery Inc: $440,101 over 7y, 13% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $394,562 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA NORTH: $386,716 over 4y, 19% of budgetAMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC: $343,274 over 5y, 17% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $336,748 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMATILDA JOSLYN GAGE FOUNDATION: $250,475 over 8y, 20% of budgetNEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC: $120,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $101,358 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetUPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $82,291 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC: $65,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMASCOMA COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC: $63,851 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetWEST CENTRAL SERVICES INC: $46,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTWIN PINES HOUSING TRUST: $45,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLEBANON OPERA HOUSE IMPROVEMENT CORP: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHANOVER CONSERVANCY: $18,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE HUMANITIES COUNCIL: $12,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PINE PARK ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMoraga Education Foundation: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPPER VALLEY MUSIC CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHANOVER ROTARY CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetDartmouth Health Home Care Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVITAL COMMUNITIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlice Peck Day Memorial Hospital: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINDING OUR STRIDE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPOSITIVE TRACKS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN STAGE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Community Gallery Inc ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds OPERA NORTH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds MATILDA JOSLYN GAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds MASCOMA COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN PINES HOUSING TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON OPERA HOUSE IMPROVEMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE HUMANITIES COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE PINE PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Moraga Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY MUSIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER ROTARY CHARITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH45.3× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Lane & Elizabeth C Dwinell Fdn · The Vermont Community Foundation · Barrette Family Fund · Crowell Family Foundation 7522-Xxxxxx00058 · Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · Trustees of Dartmouth College · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Stannard & Dorothy Dunn Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mt Roeschmore Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mt Roeschmore Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Upper Valley Haven: 27% of income from government
  • Vital Communities Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Northern Stage Company: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mt Roeschmore’s filings →

More from the funding graph