Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mrs Giles Whiting Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
78
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$301k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$5.8MEducation$1.2MPublic Benefit$710kHealth$138kEnvironment$75kSocial Science$70kHousing & Shelter$60kAnimals$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 78 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k54 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $710k
  • $250k+1 grant · $301k
$20,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CULTURAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE (CER)$301,000
THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE$70,000
INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE & ART INC$70,000
NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY$65,000
WORDS WITHOUT BORDERS$65,000
ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS$60,000
NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY$60,000
PAIDEIA INSTITUTE$60,000
PLATO$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
GRAND CENTRAL ATELIER INC$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
HOUSE OF SPEAKEASY FOUNDATION$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($9.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($1.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%DREAM OF DETROIT: $10k → 21%MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($1.3M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Netherlands$1.3M · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 98 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

98 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
126

Total granted

$6.3M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+22%

Still filing today

33%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalEnvironmentHealthSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $275k · revenue +4%
  • WW
    Words Without Borders Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $255k · revenue +38%
  • TF
    THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $215k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • PL
    PHILOSOPHY LEARNING AND TEACHING ORGgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +29%
  • AT
    AQUILA THEATRE
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • KC
    KERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Columbia University Press

Enhance Columbia University's education mission by acquiring and publishing outstanding original works by scholars and others that contribute to an understanding of global human concerns. Columbia University Press became part of the…

Arts & Culture
4
Graywolf Press

Graywolf press publishes risk-taking, visionary writers who transform culture through literature. when writers are free to do their most ambitious work, their books serve as portals to new possibilities and enable deeper understanding…

Arts & Culture
5
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
8
Berggruen Institute
Education
9
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
10
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
11
The Academy of American Poets Inc

To encourage, stimulate, and foster the production of american poetry by providing fellowships for poets of proven merit, by granting scholarships, awards and prizes for poetic achievement, and by other such means as the board of directors…

Arts & Culture
12
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian American Writers Workshop Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marion & Ben Duffy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 257 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
85/85
Grantees still filing
56/85
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $580,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRINCE CLAUS FUND: $416,128 · OtherPRINCE CLAUS FUNDCULTURAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE (CER): $301,000 · Other+150 more: $5,761,882 · Other+150 moreNew York Historical Society: $230,000 · Arts & CultureNew York Hist…THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC: $215,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE FOR A…GRAND CENTRAL ATELIER INC: $120,400 · Arts & CultureGRAND CENTRAL…OPERA AMERICA INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureZYZZYVA INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureThe Massachusetts Review Inc: $60,000 · Arts & CultureLitro Media Inc: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+16 more: $417,098 · Arts & Culture+16 moreTHE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC: $275,000 · EducationTHE INSTITUT…The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $180,000 · EducationThe New York…THE ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS INC: $180,000 · EducationTHE ACADEMY …PHILOSOPHY LEARNING AND TEACHING ORG: $60,000 · EducationONE STORY INC: $60,000 · EducationClaremont Graduate University: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationLOS ANGELES REVIEW OF BOOKS: $40,000 · EducationTHE PARIS REVIEW FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Education+6 more: $165,000 · Education+6 moreWords Without Borders Inc: $255,000 · InternationalTURQUOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION (US): $105,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalHOUSE OF SPEAKEASY FOUNDATION: $145,400 · Membership BenefitWOMEN ON 20S INC: $50,000 · Social ScienceTFI DIGITAL ARCHIVE: $40,000 · Social ScienceTHE ORION SOCIETY INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentDUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $16,650 · Environment
Other$7,059,010Arts & Culture$1,212,498Education$1,150,000International$385,000Membership Benefit$145,400Social Science$90,000Environment$56,650

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC: $275,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetWords Without Borders Inc: $255,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetNew York Historical Society: $230,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC: $215,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $180,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS INC: $180,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetHOUSE OF SPEAKEASY FOUNDATION: $145,400 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetGRAND CENTRAL ATELIER INC: $120,400 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTURQUOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION (US): $105,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetPHILOSOPHY LEARNING AND TEACHING ORG: $60,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetONE STORY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetOPERA AMERICA INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetZYZZYVA INC: $60,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetThe Massachusetts Review Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetClaremont Graduate University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN ON 20S INC: $50,000 over 1y, 78% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLitro Media Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetTHE ORION SOCIETY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMIZNA: $40,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES REVIEW OF BOOKS: $40,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetTHE OXFORD AMERICAN LITERARY PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTFI DIGITAL ARCHIVE: $40,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTHE PARIS REVIEW FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKWELI JOURNAL INC: $30,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetBELLEVUE LITERARY REVIEW INC: $30,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetSALMAGUNDI CLUB: $30,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $24,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CULTURAL REVIEW: $22,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN SHORT FICTION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF YADDO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGUERNICA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetLITERACY ACADEMY COLLECTIVE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN WRITERS WORKSHOP INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL CIVIC ART SOCIETY: $18,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetDUTCHESS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $16,650 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $16,098 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoglifter Press: $15,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC ↗
  • Who funds Words Without Borders Inc ↗
  • Who funds New York Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF SPEAKEASY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CENTRAL ATELIER INC ↗
  • Who funds TURQUOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION (US) ↗
  • Who funds PHILOSOPHY LEARNING AND TEACHING ORG ↗
  • Who funds ONE STORY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERA AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ZYZZYVA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Massachusetts Review Inc ↗
  • Who funds Claremont Graduate University ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morris and Alma Schapiro FundNY24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morris and Alma Schapiro Fund · Council of Literary Magazines and Presses · The Poetry Foundation · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Adams Arthur & Alice Fdn · Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Pollock-Krasner Foundation Inc · Shuree Abrams Foundation · The Rona Jaffe Foundation · The Walbridge Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mrs Giles Whiting Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mrs Giles Whiting Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • The Massachusetts Review Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Orion Society Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
  • Bennington College Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mrs Giles Whiting Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mrs Giles Whiting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 257 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mrs Giles Whiting’s filings →

More from the funding graph