· Public charity
Council of Literary Magazines and Presses
The COUNCIL OF LITERARY MAGAZINES AND PRESSES serves one of the most active segments of american arts and culture: the independent publishers of exceptional fiction, poetry and prose.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 55 grants below total $533,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $868,675 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $334,925 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k45 grants · $470k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ELECTRIC LIT INC | $15,000 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS INC | $15,000 |
| CARDBOARD HOUSE PRESS | $15,000 |
| LITTLE PUSS PRESS LLC | $15,000 |
| ONE STORY INC | $10,000 |
| NARRATIVE MAGAZINE INC | $10,000 |
| GREEN LINDEN PRESS | $10,000 |
| COFFEE HOUSE PRESS | $10,000 |
| CALLALOO FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS INC | $10,000 |
| FEMINIST PRESS INC | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR THE ART OF TRANSLATION | $10,000 |
| FUTUREPOEM INC | $10,000 |
| BRINK LITERACY PROJECT | $10,000 |
| BAMBOO RIDGE PRESS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $338k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OSONE STORY INC3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +36%
FRACTURED ATLAS INC3× · 2023–2025 · $52k · revenue +5%- SSHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- FSFULL STOP MAGAZINE INCone grant, 2024 · $13k
- CDCENTRO DE ECONOMIA CREATIVA INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -30%
- AVAfrican Voices Communications Incone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through publications, events, and active community participation, Nomadic Press collectively weaves together platforms for intentionally marginalized voices to take their rightful place within the world of the written and spoken word.…
To publish sexual-trauma survivors' poetry and prose to provide healing and empowerment, and to conduct poetry workshops for survivors to introduce them to the healing power of creative expression.
Poetry flash builds community through literature
public charity
Dzanc Books was hailed as the future of publishing in Publishers Weekly in December 2007. Beginning with modest goals of publishing 4-6 titles each year, the house now publishes between 10-15 books annually. Notable and award-winning…
Saturnalia Books is a nonprofit independent literary press. Our mission is to publish poetry of high merit and to encourage the publication of literature of a non-commercial and challenging nature.
Opojaz Inc (DBA Boulevard) is an award-winning literary magazine publishing the finest fiction, poetry & definitive essays on the arts and culture & sponsors three emerging writers contests benefiting approximately 10,000 individuals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Public Space Literary Projects Inc and the most unlike its peers is Soapbox the Feminist Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Center for the Art of Translation ↗
- Who funds ONE STORY INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds SHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC ↗
- Who funds ELECTRIC LIT INC ↗
- Who funds THE ORION SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE LITERARY PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FEMINIST PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds ARCHIPELAGO BOOKS INC ↗
- Who funds OMNIDAWN PUBLISHING INC ↗
- Who funds NIGHTBOAT BOOKS INC ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE LITERARY REVIEW INC ↗
- Who funds Center for the Narrative and Lyric Arts ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SHORT FICTION INC ↗
- Who funds GUERNICA INC ↗
- Who funds MUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES ↗
- Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GRAYWOLF PRESS ↗
- Who funds THE OXFORD AMERICAN LITERARY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds RAIN TAXI INC ↗
- Who funds THE BELOIT POETRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PHILIPPINE AMERICAN WRITERS AND ARTISTS ↗
- Who funds ALICE JAMES POETRY COOPERATIVE ↗
- Who funds EPIPHANY MAGAZINE INC ↗
- Who funds Sinister Wisdom Inc ↗
- Who funds CALLALOO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAMBOO RIDGE PRESS ↗
- Who funds FUTUREPOEM INC ↗
- Who funds CARDBOARD HOUSE PRESS ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE ECONOMIA CREATIVA INC ↗
- Who funds MCSWEENEY'S LITERARY ARTS FUND ↗
- Who funds ROSE METAL PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds UGLY DUCKLING PRESSE LTD ↗
- Who funds BRINK LITERACY PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Poetry Foundation · Mrs Giles Whiting Foundation · Hawthornden Foundation · Gaea Foundation Inc · Just Buffalo Literary Center Inc · New Israel Fund · Jerome Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Tides Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Council of Literary Magazines and Presses funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cavankerry Press Ltd — 24% of income from government
- Tupelo Press Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Orion Society Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.