· Private foundation
The Pollock-Krasner Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $2k
- $10k–50k76 grants · $2.4M
- $50k–250k5 grants · $356k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $150,000 |
| FUNDACION CALLIA | $55,940 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| RABINOVICH THE ESTATE OF RAQUEL | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| MATHIS AMANDA C | $48,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $47,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $45,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $45,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $45,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $43,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $42,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 74% of grant dollars ($20M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 26% that went abroad ($6.8M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 26% of all-years giving ($6.8M)
43 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
50 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 59 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VSVERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC6× · 2017–2025 · $288k · revenue +120%
- ISINTERNATIONAL STUDIO & CURATORIAL PROGRAM INC8× · 2017–2025 · $270k · revenue +30%
NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +208%
Funded once
- TPThe Pierpont Morgan Librarygraduatedone grant, 2017 · $135k · revenue +109%
PORTLAND ART MUSEUMone grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue -17%- SBSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +193%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.
The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.
The arnot art museum is an exhibiting and collecting fine arts museum, accredited by the american association of museums. the museum exhibits its permanent collection of 17th-19th century european paintings and sculpture; 19th century…
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
Dedicated to the creation, presentation and advancement of contemporary art through its exhibitions, educational programming and studio art program.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The American Federation of Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Deborah Remington Charitable Trust for the Visual Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 883 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL STUDIO & CURATORIAL PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE STREET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CORPORATION OF YADDO ↗
- Who funds THE SCULPTURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds The Bronx Museum of the Arts ↗
- Who funds FINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC ↗
- Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STORM KING ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds SKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC ↗
- Who funds MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds MARIAN AND EDWARD MACDOWELL INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ART RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds ARTTABLE INC ↗
- Who funds ARTCOUNCIL INC DBA ARTADIA ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN ↗
- Who funds WAVE HILL INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · Arison Arts Foundation · Ag Foundation · The Cowles Charitable Trust · Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · Hillman Family Foundations · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · The Kraus Family Foundation · May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Pollock-Krasner Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc — 27% of income from government
- The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Vermont Studio Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Pollock-Krasner Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Pollock-Krasner Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.