Skip to content
Mrcharity Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mrcharity Inc

To utilize social media platforms to reach wide audiences to raise awareness and funds; to partner with other charitable organizations to alleviate homelessness, hunger, and unemployment.

$7.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$927k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.4MInternational$1.1MEnvironment$831kHealth$381kHuman Services$311kEducation$240kAnimals$220kRecreation & Sports$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $3,160,928, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,087,362 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,926,434 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
$115,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHARING EXCESS$927,096
GIVE POWER FOUNDATION$470,100
THE BALAM FOUNDATION$220,454
GIVEDIRECTLY$200,000
GHANA MAKE A DIFFERENCE$175,000
RON CLARK ACADEMY$170,625
ISAIAH 6 PROJECT$164,021
DIRECT RELIEF$150,000
HOSPITALS FOR HUMANITY$115,000
TILJALA SHED$112,595
UDAYAN CARE USA$110,000
ADAPTIVE TRAINING FOUNDATION$100,000
THE HOMETOWN FOUNDATION$100,000
BUILD COMMAND TEAM$52,537
OPERATION SMILE$43,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WELLS OF LIFE: $40k → 10%SDSN ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 17%ADAPTIVE TRAINING FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%GIVE POWER FOUNDATION: $470k → 10%HOPEFUL RESTORATION GROUP INC: $10k → 13%TECHO: $236k → 15%CHURCHES OUTREACH NETWORK: $35k → 20%WELLS OF LIFE: $25k → 10%GIVE POWER FOUNDATION: $360k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TECHO: $82k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MI
NY
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 7 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$2.8M
$405k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+12%

Still filing today

100%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionEducationPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    SHARING EXCESS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +694%
  • GF
    GIVEPOWER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $831k · revenue +11%
  • RC
    RON CLARK ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $176k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • CURE INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $267k · revenue +44%
  • CO
    Churches Outreach Network
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue -26%
  • HR
    Hopi Relief
    2× · 2022–2023 · $27k · revenue -38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Deliver the Difference Inc

Deliver The Difference is a humanitarian hunger relief organizations. We believe it is wrong that children go to bed hungry and not knowing where their next meal will come from. We believe it is wrong that seniors have to decided whether…

—
2
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
3
Feeding Charlotte Inc

Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…

Food & Nutrition
4
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
5
Change the World Relief Organization Inc

Humanitarian and disaster relief to people in western north carolina, the united states and around the world by receiving funds, goods, and equipment from donors and passing them on to individuals in need as well as other charitable…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
7
Food for the Cities

We are a ministry of servants that lead souls to Jesus Christ and leave a lasting impact on the world for Gods glory. Our vision is to save the people of the USA, Amazon and the World with the Gospel of Jesus Christ and disciple them into…

Human Services
8
Restoring Faith Inc

The Mission of Restoring Faith Inc. is to reflect the love of Christ and improve the quality of life to the most vulnerable families by providing basic necessities and emergency aid on a local and global scale.

Religion
9
Church World Service Inc

Church world service, inc. is a private, voluntary faith-based organization with 37 member communions that transformscommunities around the globe through just and sustainable responses to hunger, poverty, displacement and disaster.

International
10
Impact in the World Trough Healthcare Inc

no

International
11
The Open Door of Perquimans County Inc

The mission of the open door of perquimans county, inc. is to eliminate hunger and improve the health and well-being of our community through access to healthy and nutritious foods, education, and advocacy.

—
12
In His Steps Pathways of Peace

Religious Humanitarian

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Givedirectly Inc; the most unlike its peers is Build Command Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
24/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIVEPOWER FOUNDATION: $830,506 · Human ServicesGIVEPOWER FOUNDATIONAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc: $318,498 · Human ServicesAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi …GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INCAdaptive Training Foundation: $100,000 · Human ServicesAdaptive Training FoundationWELLS OF LIFE INC: $65,000 · Human Services+4 more: $64,673 · Human ServicesSHARING EXCESS: $1,310,097 · Food & NutritionSHARING EXCESS+1 more: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $267,000 · InternationalCURE INTERNATIONAL INCGhana Make a Difference: $175,000 · InternationalGhana Make a DifferenceDIRECT RELIEF: $150,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFHOSPITALS FOR HUMANITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 · InternationalHOSPITALS FOR HUMANITY FO…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $112,595 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION I…UDAYAN CARE USA: $110,000 · InternationalUDAYAN CARE USAOPERATION SMILE INC: $87,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $45,000 · InternationalRON CLARK ACADEMY INC: $175,768 · EducationBUILD Command Team: $52,537 · EducationThe Balam Foundation Inc: $220,454 · AnimalsISAIAH 6 PROJECT: $164,021 · OtherMT TRIUMPH BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherNORTH PITT HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherHopi Relief: $26,648 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 · OtherHAVEN AT BLUE CREEK INC: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $1,500 · OtherTHE HOMETOWN FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$1,578,677Food & Nutrition$1,320,097International$1,061,595Education$228,305Animals$220,454Other$252,169Philanthropy$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHARING EXCESS: $1,310,097 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetGIVEPOWER FOUNDATION: $830,506 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc: $318,498 over 2y, 16% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $267,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Balam Foundation Inc: $220,454 over 1y, 28% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRON CLARK ACADEMY INC: $175,768 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGhana Make a Difference: $175,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPITALS FOR HUMANITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $112,595 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUDAYAN CARE USA: $110,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetAdaptive Training Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE HOMETOWN FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $87,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWELLS OF LIFE INC: $65,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBUILD Command Team: $52,537 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChurches Outreach Network: $35,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetHopi Relief: $26,648 over 2y, 19% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN AT BLUE CREEK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $14,498 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJesus Others & You Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetHOPEFUL RESTORATION GROUP INC: $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetSDSN ASSOCIATION INC: $5,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

University Health Sys…North Carolina Commun…James J & Mamie Richa…Eddie and Jo Allison …Food Bank of Central …The Cannon Foundation…United Way of Pitt Co…W Russell and Patrici…Foundation for the Ca…American Endowment Fo…Charities Aid Foundat…Good360
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation IncNC24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · James J & Mamie Richardson Perkins Memorial Fund - C/O Bank of America · Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · United Way of Pitt County Inc · W Russell and Patricia Davis Duke Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Good360

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mrcharity Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mrcharity Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mrcharity Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mrcharity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mrcharity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home