Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mr Ts Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$126kHealth$115kFood & Nutrition$15kEducation$12kReligion$11kAnimals$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEST FOOT FORWARD FD$40,000
BROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION$2,000
FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DVPMT CNTR$2,000
CROS MINISTRIES$1,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FD$1,000
ZENO MOUNTAIN FARMS$1,000
RICHARD DAVID KANN MELANOMA FD$1,000
NATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
MN
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
VA
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 22 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$279k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+12%

Still filing today

32%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesReligionInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    Way Media Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +17%
  • University of South Florida Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +132%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • GB
    GFR BAHAMAS ANIMAL RELIEF
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • UM
    UCSF MELANOMA PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
5
Caring Cross Inc

Caring cross is focused upon accelerating the development and implementation of advanced medicines like car-t cell and stem cell gene therapies. in partnership with like-minded stakeholders, caring cross develops and deploys technologies,…

Health
6
Acmg Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine

Support the american college of medical genetics and genomics' (acmg) educational mission to "translate genes into health" by raising funds to attract the next generation of medical geneticists and genetic counselors, to sponsor important…

—
7
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
8
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
9
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
10
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
12
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smile Train Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEST FOOT FORWARD FD: $125,500 · OtherBEST FOOT FORWARD FDBOCA RATON COMM HOSPITAL FNDN: $45,000 · OtherBOCA RATON COMM HOSPITAL FNDNFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DVPMT CNTR: $13,600 · OtherFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DVPMT CNTRZENO MOUNTAIN FARMS: $12,000 · OtherWay Media Inc: $10,500 · Other+22 more: $44,404 · Other+22 moreBROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $33,000 · HealthBROWARD CHIL…+3 more: $660 · HealthUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $10,000 · EducationTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyEAST TENNESSEE FOUNDATION: $2,062 · PhilanthropyWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,133 · InternationalChristians Reaching Out To Society Inc: $3,000 · ReligionWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,750 · Human Services
Other$251,004Health$33,660Education$10,000Philanthropy$5,062International$3,133Religion$3,000Human Services$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $33,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWay Media Inc: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,133 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChristians Reaching Out To Society Inc: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TENNESSEE FOUNDATION: $2,062 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $60 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Way Media Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Christians Reaching Out To Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds EAST TENNESSEE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mr Ts Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mr Ts Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Broward Childrens Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mr Ts Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph