Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mr Owl Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$176k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$360kEducation$140kInternational$137kYouth Development$120kHousing & Shelter$106kPhilanthropy$90kPublic Safety & Disaster$47k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM$55,000
NOTICEABILITY INC$25,000
ST FRANCIS HOUSE$16,000
FLYING KITES INC$15,000
PINE STREET INN$15,000
WINGS OF AMERICA$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
CROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC$10,000
DIRECT RELIEF$10,000
PRECIOUS PROJECT INC$5,000
THE LENNY ZAKIM FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PINE STREET INN: $15k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $16k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $5k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $5k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $5k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $5k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Mr Owl Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 71%.

Mr Owl Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$999k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$999k
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $360k · revenue +108%
  • NI
    NoticeAbility Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $140k · revenue +13%
  • FK
    FLYING KITES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +39%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    The Water Research Foundation

    The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

    Environment
    2
    Northeast College of Health Sciences

    Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

    Education
    3
    Boston Architectural College

    The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

    —
    4
    Us Digital Response

    U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

    Public Safety & Disaster
    5
    Massachusetts Business Roundtable Inc

    The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…

    —
    6
    Devworks International

    Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

    Human Services
    7
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

    Education
    8
    The Bridgespan Group Inc

    Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

    Community Improvement
    9
    Ceres Inc

    Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

    Environment
    10
    Wheaton College

    Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

    Education
    11
    Accion International

    Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

    International
    12
    Brighton Marine Inc

    Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lenny Zakim Fund; the most unlike its peers is NoticeAbility Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    05the grantee network

    11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/11
    Grantees still filing
    8/11
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $360,000 · AnimalsNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATIONFLYING KITES INC: $90,000 · InternationalFLYING KITES INCDIRECT RELIEF: $46,500 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $46,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHE…NoticeAbility Inc: $140,000 · EducationNoticeAbility I…PINE STREET INN INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET …SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCI…THE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentCROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE LENNY ZAKIM FUND: $45,000 · ReligionPRECIOUS PROJECT INC: $45,000 · Philanthropy
    Animals$360,000International$183,000Education$140,000Human Services$106,000Youth Development$60,000Recreation & Sports$60,000Religion$45,000Philanthropy$45,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $360,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNoticeAbility Inc: $140,000 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetFLYING KITES INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetCROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $46,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $46,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LENNY ZAKIM FUND: $45,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetPRECIOUS PROJECT INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $41,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
    • Who funds NoticeAbility Inc ↗
    • Who funds FLYING KITES INC ↗
    • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
    • Who funds THE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds CROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC ↗
    • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
    • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
    • Who funds THE LENNY ZAKIM FUND ↗
    • Who funds PRECIOUS PROJECT INC ↗
    • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Mr Owl Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mr Owl Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
    • Saint Francis House Inc: 18% of income from government
    • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
    • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
    • Crossroads for Kids Inc: 1% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mr Owl’s filings →

    More from the funding graph