Skip to content
Movember Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Movember Foundation

Please refer to schedule o

$2.0M
Granted FY2026still arriving
18
Grants FY2026still arriving
12
States reached
$304k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$40MEducation$696kCivil Rights$10k
02FY2026 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $1,859,667, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,970,774 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $111,107 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $909k
  • $250k+3 grants · $852k
$82,634
Median grant
12
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$303,804
REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$291,300
LAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA$256,500
KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY$189,567
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$158,747
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$127,824
PCCTC$104,611
UNITED WOMEN OF EAST AFRICA$94,166
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY$82,634
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$79,862
ADELPHI UNIVERSITY$71,272
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA$27,500
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$12,220
CALLING OUR SPIRITS FORWARD (FISCAL SPONSOR IS NATIVE ACTION INC)$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $688k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNITED WOMEN OF EAST AFRICA: $235k → 11%LESBIAN & GAY COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER INC: $10k → 17%UNITED WOMEN OF EAST AFRICA: $218k → 11%UNITED WOMEN OF EAST AFRICA: $130k → 11%UNITED WOMEN OF EAST AFRICA: $94k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42M · 25 repeat orgs$837k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
9

Total granted

$42M
$405k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+7%

Still filing today

56%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $432k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25’26
HealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +57%
  • Prevention Institute
    6× · 2017–2022 · $13M · revenue +58% · 68% of their budget
  • GW
    GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • RT
    Research Triangle Institute
    one grant, 2022 · $119k · revenue +1%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2025 · $63k
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $53k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
8
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
9
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
10
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sinai Health System; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $13,486,361 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION+1 more: $412,481 · PhilanthropyPrevention Institute: $12,672,481 · Arts & CulturePrevention InstituteGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELEC…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $2,723,979 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $2,163,949 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDAREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $2,023,612 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $1,538,724 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN …REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $491,750 · OtherTHE PROSTATE CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS CONSORTIUM - PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $445,355 · OtherFIRST RESPONDER CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE (FRCE): $411,259 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $379,750 · Other+13 more: $1,046,942 · Other+13 moreKOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES: $590,191 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $370,968 · HealthSouthern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation: $328,245 · HealthSouthcentral Foundation: $271,538 · HealthSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $180,000 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical Center: $177,239 · Health+4 more: $96,494 · HealthEmory University: $682,696 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $86,152 · EducationADELPHI UNIVERSITY: $71,272 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $53,076 · EducationUnited Women of East Africa Support Team: $677,665 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesLAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA: $256,500 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$13,898,842Arts & Culture$13,672,481Other$11,225,320Health$2,014,675Education$893,196Human Services$687,665Recreation & Sports$256,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $13,486,361 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetPrevention Institute: $12,672,481 over 6y, 68% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEmory University: $682,696 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Women of East Africa Support Team: $677,665 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetKOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES: $590,191 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetThe Livestrong Foundation: $412,481 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $370,968 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation: $328,245 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSouthcentral Foundation: $271,538 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $180,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $177,239 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $118,837 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $86,152 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $53,076 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $43,128 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN AUSTRALIAN ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $36,256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $8,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Prevention Institute ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds United Women of East Africa Support Team ↗
  • Who funds KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds The Livestrong Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Southern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Southcentral Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ADELPHI UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN AUSTRALIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEXUAL MEDICINE SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Movember Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Movember Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Southern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation: 83% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Movember’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home