Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mourier Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$428k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$2.3MReligion$902kInternational$875kFood & Nutrition$790kHuman Services$730kHealth$675kPhilanthropy$575kScience & Tech$515kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$60,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$48M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPASSION PLANET$428,000
ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$400,000
CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY$250,000
AGAPE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS$225,000
YOUNG LIFE$200,000
SACRAMENTO VALLEY TEEN CHALLENGE$150,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PLACER COUNTY$100,000
CHARA INC$100,000
MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP$60,000
HARVEST COMMUNITY CHURCH$60,000
YOUNG LIFE GOLD COUNTRY$50,000
COLLEGE GOLF FELLOWSHIP$50,000
CHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
ACRES OF HOPE$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $870k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $250k → 6%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $200k → 6%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $120k → 6%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $100k → 6%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $100k → 6%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $100k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
CA
CO
TN
NC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.5M · 18 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$9.5M
$341k

Still filing today

61%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionFood & NutritionScience & TechHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    Agape International Missions
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +65%
  • CP
    COMPASSION PLANET
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +85%
  • CO
    CASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter
    6× · 2020–2025 · $870k · revenue +248%

Funded once

  • AB
    AUBURN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $131k
  • HG
    HEALING GROVE HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • RO
    ROCK OF ROSEVILLE
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Cef Norcal

Child Evangelism Fellowship is an evangelical, bible-centered mission whose purpose is to evangelize boys and girls with the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and to establish/disciple them in the word of God and in a local church for…

Human Services
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of jesus christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
7
Coalition for Christian Outreach

The cco (coalition for christian outreach) is an interdenominational campus ministry organization with a mission of "transforming college students to transform the world." the cco is supported primarily through donor contributions and…

—
8
Youth Conference Ministries Inc

To develop youth servant leaders who will share the message of jesus christ with their peers.

Youth Development
9
South Central Minnesota Youth for Christ Inc

Reaching out to young people everywhere to raise up life-long followers of Jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the Word of God and prayer, passion for sharing the love of Christ, and commitment to social involvement.

Youth Development
10
Cultivate Missions

Cultivate leadership seeks to make disciples of jesus christ and plant churches among asian young professionals throughout asia.

Religion
11
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
12
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacramento Valley Teen Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christian Veterinary Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys and Girls Club of Placer County: $1,818,604 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Placer CountyAgape International Missions: $1,075,000 · OtherAgape International MissionsHARVEST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $332,000 · OtherHARVEST COMMUNITY CHURCHMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP: $330,000 · OtherMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIPACRES OF HOPE: $180,000 · OtherCollege Golf Fellowship: $260,000 · Other+15 more: $1,074,395 · Other+15 moreCOMPASSION PLANET: $1,068,000 · Food & NutritionCOMPASSION P…ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA: $915,000 · Science & TechENGINEERIN…CASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter: $870,000 · Human ServicesCASA of P…SACRAMENTO VALLEY TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $750,000 · HealthCHARA INC: $575,000 · PhilanthropyPlacer Community Foundation: $120,000 · PhilanthropyYOUNG LIFE: $620,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,069,999Food & Nutrition$1,068,000Science & Tech$915,000Human Services$870,000Health$750,000Philanthropy$695,000Youth Development$620,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys and Girls Club of Placer County: $1,818,604 over 5y, 45% of budgetAgape International Missions: $1,075,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetCOMPASSION PLANET: $1,068,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA: $915,000 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetCASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter: $870,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetSACRAMENTO VALLEY TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $750,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $620,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHARA INC: $575,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetCollege Golf Fellowship: $260,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION: $165,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetPLACER COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY: $135,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetPlacer Community Foundation: $120,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetVINE LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Placer County ↗
  • Who funds Agape International Missions ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION PLANET ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERING MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO VALLEY TEEN CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CHARA INC ↗
  • Who funds College Golf Fellowship ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PLACER COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY ↗
  • Who funds Placer Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VINE LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater HorizonsMO14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Horizons · Placer Community Foundation · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mourier Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mourier Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mourier Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mourier Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mourier Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph