Skip to content
Mountain View Nursing Home Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mountain View Nursing Home Inc

To provide nursing care for the elderly in a church-affiliated nursing home and to support world evangelism.

$258k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$803kHuman Services$374kRecreation & Sports$27kEducation$22kInternational$18kHousing & Shelter$7k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $161,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $258,200 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $97,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $155k
$24,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Amish Mennonite Aid$40,200
Comeragh Wilderness Camp$27,000
Oak Grove Mennonite Church$25,000
Masters International$24,000
Mission Interest Committee$18,000
Christian Aid Ministries$11,000
Deed & Truth Ministries$10,000
Charity Christian Missions$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Comeragh Wilderness Camp: $27k → 9%Anababtist Foundation: $88k → 11%Deed & Truth: $10k → 10%Miami Christian Academy: $10k → 15%Amish Mennonite Aid: $40k → 15%Masters International: $30k → 14%Deed & Truth Ministries: $10k → 15%Christian Light Missions: $6k → 15%Mission Interest Committee: $60k → 13%Christian Aid Ministries: $11k → 8%Deeper Life Ministries: $12k → 10%Arising Light Asian Min: $7k → 12%Still Waters Mennonite Church: $6k → 16%Amish Mennonite Aid: $57k → 8%Costa Rica Missions: $9k → 11%Charity Christian Missions: $12k → 9%Anababtist Foundation: $20k → 11%Amish Mennonite Aid: $38k → 15%Masters International: $24k → 14%Mission Interest Committee: $54k → 13%Christian Aid Ministries: $10k → 8%Good Life Ministries: $7k → 10%Amish Mennonite Aid: $57k → 8%Costa Rica Missions: $9k → 11%Charity Christian Missions: $6k → 9%Calvary Bible School: $12k → 15%Masters International: $24k → 14%Mission Interest Committee: $47k → 13%Christian Aid Ministries: $10k → 8%Amish Mennonite Aid: $48k → 8%Oak Grove Mennonite Church: $25k → 11%Masters International: $20k → 14%Mission Interest Committee: $45k → 13%Christian Aid Ministries: $10k → 8%Amish Mennonite Aid: $48k → 8%Madison County Rescue Squad: $7k → 11%Masters International: $18k → 14%Mission Interest Committee: $45k → 13%Christian Aid Ministries: $10k → 8%Amish Mennonite Aid: $40k → 8%Oak Grove Mennonite Church: $25k → 11%Masters International: $18k → 14%Mission Interest Committee: $45k → 13%Christian Aid Ministries: $8k → 8%Amish Mennonite Aid: $39k → 8%Masters International: $8k → 14%Mission Interest Committee: $37k → 13%Mission Interest Committee: $18k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
OH
PA
CA
VA
KS
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 99% of Mountain View Nursing Home Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 0%.

Mountain View Nursing Home Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 7 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -72% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$1.0M
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-72%

Still filing today

71%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $351k · revenue +45%
  • MI
    Masters International Ministries USA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $142k · revenue +956%
  • CA
    Christian Aid Ministries
    7× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CB
    Calvary Bible School
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • DL
    Deeper Life Ministries
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • CM
    CENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Ministries International
—
2
Amea Ministries International

Amea ministries international advances the proclamation of the christian gospel and the church throughout africa, the middle east, and asia.

Religion
3
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
Christian Aid Ministries Foundation

Christian Aid Ministries Foundations primary purpose is to educate, motivate, and assist our supporters in biblical stewardship planning.

Religion
6
Afm Ministry Inc

A Christian international para-church mission ministry governed by biblical truth that sends and supports missionaries and indigenous ministers to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ to make disciples of all nations. We equip and train…

Religion
7
Adventist Mountain Missions
Religion
8
Caribbean Ministries Association

The vision of Caribbean Ministries Association is to empower the churches of the Caribbean by providing an Interdenominational Bible training ministry and establishing and equipping God's people in God's Word.

Religion
9
Church Assistance Ministry

Church Assistance Ministry helps churches in the USA and around the world to multiply their impact by providing leadership development assistance for church leaders and denominations, and church focused missions.

Religion
10
Christian Ministries
International
11
Mission Ukraine

Supporting christian missionary

Religion
12
Intl Assn of Ministers & Ministries Inc

To provide aid, direction, training & encouragement to pastors, missionaries, teachers, counselors, lay persons and students aspiring to serve in christian ministry, including planting new churches, missionary projects, and helping poor…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Aid Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Comeragh Wilderness Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMISH MENNONITE AID INC: $367,200 · OtherAMISH MENNONITE AID INCMISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE: $351,000 · OtherMISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEEOak Grove Mennonite Church: $68,000 · OtherOak Grove Mennonite ChurchCHARITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $36,000 · Other+6 more: $49,700 · Other+6 moreMasters International Ministries USA: $142,000 · ReligionMasters Internation…Christian Aid Ministries: $64,500 · ReligionChristian Aid Minis…GOOD LIFE MINISTRIES: $7,375 · ReligionAnabaptist Foundation: $108,000 · PhilanthropyAnabaptis…COMERAGH WILDERNESS CAMP: $27,000 · Youth DevelopmentDEED & TRUTH MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 · InternationalCENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 · Education
Other$871,900Religion$213,875Philanthropy$108,000Youth Development$27,000International$20,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMISH MENNONITE AID INC: $367,200 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetMISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE: $351,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMasters International Ministries USA: $142,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetAnabaptist Foundation: $108,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetChristian Aid Ministries: $64,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMERAGH WILDERNESS CAMP: $27,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetDEED & TRUTH MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMISH MENNONITE AID INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds Masters International Ministries USA ↗
  • Who funds Anabaptist Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Christian Aid Ministries ↗
  • Who funds COMERAGH WILDERNESS CAMP ↗
  • Who funds DEED & TRUTH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MADISON COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anabaptist FoundationChristian Aid Ministr…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Anabaptist FoundationPA29.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · Christian Aid Ministries Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mountain View Nursing Home Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mountain View Nursing Home Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mountain View Nursing Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home