Arkansas · Nonprofit
MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE
MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE (Arkansas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,065,560 to it, the largest being Anabaptist Foundation ($644,484). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2025
- $15M
- Funders on record
- 7
- Grants received
- $1.1M
- Net assets
- $8.2M
What Mission Interests Committee does
Mission
Mics primary purpose is to promote the gospel of jesus christ through various avenues of ministry including evangelism, education, and benevolent forms of christian service, and the operation of one nursing home.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Hillcrest home - mic operates a nursing home located in harrison, arkansas. Hillcrest home has provided spiritual, physical, and emotional care for approximately 96 elderly clients. While providing this care to the elderly, youth receiving minimal compensation are encouraged to grow spiritually and serve christ by serving others. The extra funds generated by the minimal compensation to the youth are then used to support chrisitian evangelism throughout the world.
$11,020,418 spent89% of program spendingMissions and other organization activity support - during the year, mic supported various missions activities located in ireland. Support was given to dunmore east christian fellowship which stresses evangelism through personal and business interactions. Decf also provides workplace training and employment, hosts seminars on family living, child training and related topics, opearates a christian school, and works with troubled youth. Mic also provided support to one organziation located in the united states.
$1,320,806 spentof which $88,112 as grants11% of program spending
The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $12,341,224.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $10M to $16M (+55%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 2% · 2021 14% · 2022 3% · 2025 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Board chair
James Gingerich
Chairman
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 5 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $179k → $60k.
5 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 67% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 6 of 7 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 60% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 46% · 2018 53% · 2019 65% · 2020 86% · 2021 100% · 2022 83% · 2023 75% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
67% of MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $351k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Arkansas, across 1 state.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $715k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Organizations like MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Arkansas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
86% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 13 states
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE?
- MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE (Arkansas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,065,560 to it, the largest being Anabaptist Foundation ($644,484). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $1,065,560 in grants to MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE?
- Anabaptist Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $644,484 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arkansas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing