· Public charity
Mountain View Nursing Home Inc
To provide nursing care for the elderly in a church-affiliated nursing home and to support world evangelism.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $161,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $258,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $97,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $155k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Amish Mennonite Aid | $40,200 |
| Comeragh Wilderness Camp | $27,000 |
| Oak Grove Mennonite Church | $25,000 |
| Masters International | $24,000 |
| Mission Interest Committee | $18,000 |
| Christian Aid Ministries | $11,000 |
| Deed & Truth Ministries | $10,000 |
| Charity Christian Missions | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 99% of Mountain View Nursing Home Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against -72% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MIMISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE8× · 2017–2024 · $351k · revenue +45%
- MIMasters International Ministries USA7× · 2018–2024 · $142k · revenue +956%
- CAChristian Aid Ministries7× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- CBCalvary Bible Schoolone grant, 2021 · $12k
- DLDeeper Life Ministriesone grant, 2022 · $12k
- CMCENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -72%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Amea ministries international advances the proclamation of the christian gospel and the church throughout africa, the middle east, and asia.
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Christian Aid Ministries Foundations primary purpose is to educate, motivate, and assist our supporters in biblical stewardship planning.
A Christian international para-church mission ministry governed by biblical truth that sends and supports missionaries and indigenous ministers to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ to make disciples of all nations. We equip and train…
The vision of Caribbean Ministries Association is to empower the churches of the Caribbean by providing an Interdenominational Bible training ministry and establishing and equipping God's people in God's Word.
Church Assistance Ministry helps churches in the USA and around the world to multiply their impact by providing leadership development assistance for church leaders and denominations, and church focused missions.
Supporting christian missionary
To provide aid, direction, training & encouragement to pastors, missionaries, teachers, counselors, lay persons and students aspiring to serve in christian ministry, including planting new churches, missionary projects, and helping poor…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Aid Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Comeragh Wilderness Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMISH MENNONITE AID INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION INTERESTS COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds Masters International Ministries USA ↗
- Who funds Anabaptist Foundation ↗
- Who funds Christian Aid Ministries ↗
- Who funds COMERAGH WILDERNESS CAMP ↗
- Who funds DEED & TRUTH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MADISON COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · Christian Aid Ministries Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mountain View Nursing Home Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.