Skip to content
Motulsky-Nacht Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Motulsky-Nacht Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$578k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$71MScience & Tech$525kInternational$523kEducation$489kEnvironment$373kCrime & Legal$349kFood & Nutrition$179kHealth$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$197M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALK INSTITUTE$250,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT$50,100
OCEANA INC$50,000
CURE BLINDNESS PROJECT$50,000
CONGREGATION OR ZARUA$25,710
VOLUNTEERS OF LEGAL SERVICES$25,000
NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY$25,000
GODS LOVE WE DELIVER$25,000
BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA$25,000
CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,000
CAMFED USA$10,000
WEST SIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER$5,000
VILLAGES IN PARTNERSHIP$5,000
SECOND STAGE THEATER$5,000
L'A ARETZ FOUNDATION$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $304k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FIRST STAR: $3k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $51k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 28 repeat orgs$272k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
31

Total granted

$2.4M
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+20%

Still filing today

79%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Cornell University
    5× · 2019–2024 · $333k · revenue +50%
  • TI
    THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $301k · revenue +35%
  • HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $250k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • OA
    ONE ACRE FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +45%
  • TN
    THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +24%
  • SB
    ST BENEDICTS PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
National Philanthropic Trust

National philanthropic trust ("npt") is a public charity dedicated to increasing philanthropy in society by providing philanthropic expertise to donors, foundations and financial institutions, enabling them to realize their philanthropic…

Philanthropy
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Side Center for Community Life; the most unlike its peers is Grand Teton National Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
35/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $70,396,301 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDSALK INSTITUTE: $550,000 · OtherCURE BLINDNESS PROJECT: $100,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OR ZARUA: $67,880 · OtherNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $76,000 · OtherGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $55,000 · OtherBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $117,500 · OtherSPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC: $55,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF LEGAL SERVICE INC: $47,500 · Other+36 more: $168,255 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $550,000 · PhilanthropyGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $52,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $50,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $250,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUND: $100,000 · InternationalCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $55,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $36,000 · International+4 more: $26,720 · InternationalCornell University: $332,650 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationPOMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $16,000 · Education+4 more: $6,070 · EducationTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $301,200 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesOCEANA INC: $255,000 · Environment
Community Improvement$70,396,301Other$1,237,135Philanthropy$662,000International$467,720Education$454,720Human Services$303,700Environment$255,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $70,396,301 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $550,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $332,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $301,200 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOCEANA INC: $255,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $117,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $76,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $52,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF LEGAL SERVICE INC: $47,500 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVILLAGES IN PARTNERSHIP INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $11,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORN OF AFRICA EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetELEPHANTVOICES: $6,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $3,640 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST STAR INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR JEWISH FILMINC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetROCKHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUPPORT CONNECTION INC: $575 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAYMAKERS FOR HOPE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING ABUSE WORKING FOR CHANGE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundMorgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Boston Foundation IncJpmorgan Chase Founda…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Vanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Motulsky-Nacht Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Motulsky-Nacht Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • National Center for Jewish Filminc: 4% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Motulsky-Nacht Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home