Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moss Adamson Spalding Charities

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$427kHealth$91kEducation$57kReligion$36kRecreation & Sports$9kYouth Development$7kHuman Services$6kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Serenity Foundation of Texas$25,000
Culver Stockton College$10,000
Nat'l Center Children's Ill Lit$9,000
Pioneer Drive Baptist Church$5,000
First Baptist - City Lights$2,500
Stamford Carnegie Library$2,500
Texas Trails Council BSA$2,500
Big Country Athletic Hall of Fame$1,500
Basketball Smiles$1,000
Samaritan's Purse$1,000
Christian Homes$1,000
Abilene Woman's Club$1,000
Love and Care Ministries$1,000
First Central Presbyterian$1,000
Faithworks of Abilene$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Love and Care Ministries: $1k → 16%Love and Care Ministries: $1k → 16%NOROC Inc: $1k → 16%NOROC Inc: $250 → 16%NOROC Inc: $200 → 16%Alliance for Women Children: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$648k · 21 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
21

Total granted

$648k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+26%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $414k · revenue +132%
  • SF
    Serenity Foundation of Texas
    4× · 2018–2025 · $84k · revenue +11%
  • GM
    GRACE MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -18%
  • AH
    ABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +110%
  • AI
    Altrusa International of Abilene
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
2
Abilene Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The purpose of the Organization is to provide knowledge and understanding of economics, matters of public concern, finance, education and training, and problems of minority groups therby promoting the economy and quality of life in Abilene…

—
3
Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc

The mission of the Arts Council is to nurture and strengthen the artistic, cultural and educational quality of the community.

Arts & Culture
4
Texas Cultural Trust Council

Public arts funding

Philanthropy
5
Pregnancy Resources of Abilene Inc

Pregnancy Resources' mission is to inspire hope and unconditionally love everyone we serve by empowering them to thrive through compassionate support and positive solutions.

Civil Rights
6
Creative Waco

Creative waco's mission is to grow and support a thriving cultural and creative community in waco and mclennan county, texas.

Arts & Culture
7
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
8
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
9
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
10
Abilene Chamber of Commerce

The mission of Abilene Chamber of Commerce is to promote the economy and quality of life in Abilene, Texas by providing services to local businesses, educational opportunities, promoting Abilene as a travel destination, and promoting…

—
11
Wichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture

To provide leadership to support, promote and cultivate the arts in Wichita Falls and the surrounding area. To strengthen and elevate arts and culture including, but not limited to, visual and performing arts, literature, culinary arts,…

Arts & Culture
12
Abilene Preservation League Inc

Our mission is to preserve historic buildings and promote historic preservation.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Abilene Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE: $413,876 · Arts & CultureABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE+7 more: $13,975 · Arts & CultureNat'l Center Children's Ill Lit: $37,900 · OtherNat'l Center Children's…Individual grant recipient: $23,040 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…PIONEER DRIVE BAPTIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherPIONEER DRIVE BAPTIST C…Individual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…First Central Presbyterian: $8,000 · OtherFirst Central Presbyter…The Abilene Womans Club: $6,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC: $5,000 · Other+23 more: $29,775 · Other+23 moreSerenity Foundation of Texas: $84,000 · HealthSerenity Foun…CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $11,000 · EducationFaithworks of Abilene Inc: $3,100 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationBASKETBALL SMILES: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentRAISING YOUTH SERVICES: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentMENTORING ALLIANCE: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentLove & Care Ministries: $2,000 · Human ServicesNOROC INC: $1,700 · Human ServicesAlliance for Women and Children: $1,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 · Religion
Arts & Culture$427,851Other$140,215Health$84,000Education$14,200Youth Development$10,000Human Services$4,700Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE: $413,876 over 7y, 10% of budgetSerenity Foundation of Texas: $84,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBASKETBALL SMILES: $6,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE MUSEUM INC: $4,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Trails Council Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFaithworks of Abilene Inc: $3,100 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLove & Care Ministries: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNOROC INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBIG COUNTRY ATHLETIC HALL OF FAME: $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCenter for Contemporary Arts: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetQUINCY COMMUNITY THEATRE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEARLAND YOUTH LACROSSE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAbilene Womans Club Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAlliance for Women and Children: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOAH PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTaylor County History Center: $125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Serenity Foundation of Texas ↗
  • Who funds CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Abilene Womans Club ↗
  • Who funds BASKETBALL SMILES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Trails Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds Faithworks of Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAISING YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Love & Care Ministries ↗
  • Who funds NOROC INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG COUNTRY ATHLETIC HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds Center for Contemporary Arts ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY COMMUNITY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds MENTORING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PEARLAND YOUTH LACROSSE ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Womans Club Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Women and Children ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greathouse FoundationTX39× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greathouse Foundation · Barber Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Claude & Mae Moss Charities · Shelton Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · The Massey Family Charitable Trust · The Robison Excelsior Foundation · The Karakin Foundation · The Hodges Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moss Adamson Spalding Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moss Adamson Spalding Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Moss Adamson Spalding Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Moss Adamson Spalding Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moss Adamson Spalding Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph