Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Claude & Mae Moss Charities

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
8
Organizations funded FY2020
25%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$500
Largest grant, FY2020
$5,300
Organizations funded a year
8 to 26
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
2
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 25% of the organizations Claude & Mae Moss Charities funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20208$8k25%
FY201926$42k35%
FY201821$17k57%
FY201720$15kn/a
86% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Arts & Culture$28kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$7kEducation$4kReligion$4kHousing & Shelter$3kAnimals$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 24 grantees
All grantees of Claude & Mae Moss Charities by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Abilene Arts Alliance$10,00021%
National Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat$9,20041%
Serenity Foundation of Texas$9,00020%
Abilene Zoological Society$2,6003n/a
Abilene Education Foundation$2,0002n/a
West Shore Community Library$1,50031%
Taylor County History Center$1,27520%
Texas Trails Council Inc$1,25010%
Grace Museum Inc$1,12530%
Food Bank of West Central Texas$1,10010%
United Way of Abilene Inc$1,00010%
Grace Community Church$1,0001n/a
Kicks for Kids$1,0001n/a
Abilene Opera Association$1,00010%
Noroc Inc$75030%
Zambia Christian College Inc dba Zambia Mission Fund$7502n/a
Center for Contemporary Arts$55030%
Dyess We Care Team$5001n/a
First Central Presbyterian Church$5001n/a
Cancer Services Network Inc$32020%
The Strength for Life Foundation$2001n/a
Pioneer Drive Baptist Church$2001n/a
The Abilene Womans Club$1001n/a
Abilene Preservation League Inc$10010%

Plus 19 recipients with no EIN on record ($35k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Claude & Mae Moss Charities supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAbilene Arts Alliance: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNational Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat: $9,200 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSerenity Foundation of Texas: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWest Shore Community Library: $1,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTaylor County History Center: $1,275 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTexas Trails Council Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrace Museum Inc: $1,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of West Central Texas: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Abilene Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAbilene Opera Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNoroc Inc: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCenter for Contemporary Arts: $550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCancer Services Network Inc: $320 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAbilene Preservation League Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barber FoundationTX34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barber Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · Greathouse Foundation · Shelton Family Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Moss Adamson Spalding Charities · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · The Robison Excelsior Foundation · The Karakin Foundation · The Massey Family Charitable Trust · Jm Parker Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Claude & Mae Moss Charities with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Claude & Mae Moss Charities?

Find your warmest path to Claude & Mae Moss Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Claude & Mae Moss Charities

How much does Claude & Mae Moss Charities give?
Claude & Mae Moss Charities reported 8 grants totaling $8,025 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 26 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does Claude & Mae Moss Charities fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (31%), Health (12%), Philanthropy (8%).
Who are Claude & Mae Moss Charities's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Abilene Arts Alliance ($10k), National Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat ($9k), Serenity Foundation of Texas ($9k).
Does Claude & Mae Moss Charities fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Claude & Mae Moss Charities accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Claude & Mae Moss Charities?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Barber Foundation, Dian Graves Owen Foundation, Community Foundation of Abilene.
Where is Claude & Mae Moss Charities based?
Claude & Mae Moss Charities is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Claude & Mae Moss Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph