Skip to content
Moseley Abbie F Tuw at a glance

· Private foundation

Moseley Abbie F Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$473kHuman Services$160kArts & Culture$156kYouth Development$123kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kReligion$67kHousing & Shelter$38kPhilanthropy$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCORD HOSPITAL$38,100
Harbor Care$10,000
MY BREAST CANCER SUPPORT$10,000
RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$8,740
CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE$7,500
SPAULDING YOUTH CENTER$7,500
FAMILIES IN TRANSITION$7,500
GATHER$7,500
GRANITE VNA$7,500
HOSPICE HELP FOUNDATION$7,500
OPERATION DELTA DOG$7,500
CENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER INC$5,000
SOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$5,000
THE GRANITE YMCA$5,000
SEACOAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL$3,196
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 6%GATHER: $8k → 5%LAURA MAHONEY AUTISM & EPILEPSY FDN: $6k → 9%GATHER: $8k → 5%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $8k → 7%SEACOAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $3k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+9%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Concord Hospital Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $331k · revenue +43%
  • SA
    SPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES
    7× · 2018–2025 · $113k · revenue +100%
  • GV
    Granite VNA Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $81k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • LM
    LAURA MAHONEY AUTISM AND EPILEPSY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -67%
  • TV
    The Visiting Nurse Association Of Franklin
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
4
Central New Hampshire Vna & Hospice

Promoting dignity, independence and well-being through the delivery of quality home health, hospice and community-based care services.

—
5
Catholic Medical Center

The heart of Catholic Medical Center is to carry out Christ's healing ministry by offering health, healing, and hope to every individual who seeks our care.

Health
6
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
7
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

—
8
Concord Hospital - Laconia

CH-Laconia is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.

Health
9
Monadnock Community Hospital

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

Health
10
Home Health and Hospice Care

Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.

Health
11
Concord Counseling Services

Providing mental health, alcohol, and drug addiction treatment services to the residents of Franklin county as well as educational material and prevention services.

Health
12
Vna Home Health and Hospice Services Inc

We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverbend Community Mental Health; the most unlike its peers is Concord Female Charitable Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
10/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Concord Hospital Inc: $331,032 · HealthConcord Hospital IncSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES: $112,605 · HealthSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICESGranite VNA Inc: $81,105 · HealthGranite VNA Inc+2 more: $17,500 · HealthAMERICAN RED CROSS CONCORD CHAPTER: $80,454 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS CONCORD CHAPT…SOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $66,605 · OtherSOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CONCORD NH: $48,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIO…LEAGUE OF NH CRAFTSMEN: $36,000 · OtherLEAGUE OF NH CRAFTSMENThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association: $33,105 · OtherThe Granite Young Men's Christia…Camereta New England: $25,000 · OtherCamereta New England+6 more: $47,240 · Other+6 moreCENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER INC: $71,105 · Human ServicesCENTENNIAL…Gather: $15,708 · Human ServicesGatherNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $7,500 · Human ServicesNew Hampsh…LAURA MAHONEY AUTISM AND EPILEPSY FOUNDATION: $6,075 · Human ServicesLAURA MAHO…+1 more: $3,196 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $67,144 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'…CONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $27,500 · Arts & CultureCONCORD C…Families in Transition: $37,500 · Housing & ShelterCONCORD FEMALE CHARITABLE SOCIETY: $25,939 · PhilanthropyMANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $10,250 · Youth DevelopmentOPERATION DELTA DOG INC: $7,500 · Animals
Health$542,242Other$336,404Human Services$103,584Arts & Culture$94,644Housing & Shelter$37,500Philanthropy$25,939Youth Development$10,250Animals$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetConcord Hospital Inc: $331,032 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES: $112,605 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGranite VNA Inc: $81,105 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER INC: $71,105 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $67,144 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CONCORD NH: $48,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFamilies in Transition: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association: $33,105 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL: $27,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCamereta New England: $25,000 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetGather: $15,708 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $10,250 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMY BREAST CANCER SUPPORT: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $8,740 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION DELTA DOG INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLAURA MAHONEY AUTISM AND EPILEPSY FOUNDATION: $6,075 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetThe Visiting Nurse Association Of Franklin: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSeacoast Community School: $3,196 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Eastern Bank Foundati…Cogswell Benevolent T…Bangor Savings Bank F…Arthur L Getz Charita…Madelaine G Vonweber …Trust Uw Oleonda Jame…Granite United WaySamuel P Hunt Foundat…Arthur Jr Dobles & Ol…Lincoln Financial Fou…M L Billings Tr FBO N…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH40.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Granite United Way · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moseley Abbie F Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moseley Abbie F Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moseley Abbie F Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home