· Private foundation
Moseley Abbie F Tuw
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $79k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONCORD HOSPITAL | $38,100 |
| MY BREAST CANCER SUPPORT | $10,000 |
| Harbor Care | $10,000 |
| RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH | $8,740 |
| OPERATION DELTA DOG | $7,500 |
| SPAULDING YOUTH CENTER | $7,500 |
| FAMILIES IN TRANSITION | $7,500 |
| GATHER | $7,500 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE | $7,500 |
| HOSPICE HELP FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| GRANITE VNA | $7,500 |
| SOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH | $5,000 |
| THE GRANITE YMCA | $5,000 |
| CENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| SEACOAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $3,196 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHConcord Hospital Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $331k · revenue +32%
- SASPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES7× · 2018–2025 · $113k · revenue +100%
- GVGranite VNA Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $81k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $10k
- LMLAURA MAHONEY AUTISM AND EPILEPSY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -67%
- TVThe Visiting Nurse Association Of Franklinone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
Promoting dignity, independence and well-being through the delivery of quality home health, hospice and community-based care services.
The heart of Catholic Medical Center is to carry out Christ's healing ministry by offering health, healing, and hope to every individual who seeks our care.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
CH-Laconia is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.
Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.
Providing mental health, alcohol, and drug addiction treatment services to the residents of Franklin county as well as educational material and prevention services.
We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverbend Community Mental Health and the most unlike its peers is Concord Female Charitable Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Concord Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds SPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Granite VNA Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CONCORD NH ↗
- Who funds Families in Transition ↗
- Who funds The Granite Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds CONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CONCORD FEMALE CHARITABLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Camereta New England ↗
- Who funds Gather ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds MY BREAST CANCER SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds OPERATION DELTA DOG INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE HELP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAURA MAHONEY AUTISM AND EPILEPSY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Visiting Nurse Association Of Franklin ↗
- Who funds Seacoast Community School ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Granite United Way · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Moseley Abbie F Tuw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.