· Private foundation
Morris & Pearl Latt Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k10 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $131k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $720k
- $250k+1 grant · $360k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LEAF INC | $360,000 |
| BIRKAT YIZCHAK INC | $236,700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $168,000 |
| LEV CHESED CHARITY | $121,500 |
| JEWISH NATIONAL FUND | $96,950 |
| JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND | $96,950 |
| Individual grant recipient | $46,000 |
| SLABODKA YESHIVA | $30,000 |
| AMIT CHILDREN | $25,000 |
| BIKUR CHOLIM | $18,000 |
| NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM | $12,000 |
| MOADIM L'SIMCHA | $7,000 |
| YOUNG ISRAEL OF HANCOCK PARK | $6,000 |
| KEREN OR | $5,000 |
| BAIS YAAKOV SCHOOL FOR GIRLS | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $989k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- LCLEV CHESED CHARITY2× · 2017–2018 · $182k
- JNJEWISH NATIONAL FUND2× · 2017–2018 · $107k
- BCBIKUR CHOLIM2× · 2017–2018 · $28k · revenue -52%
Funded once
- OSOHR SOMAYACH INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -41%
- NCNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAELone grant, 2017 · $65k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAH AND TEFILone grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
publish religious books
Religious School
Religious Teaching
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
Provide college level education and extensive background of jewish law and talmudic studies and rabbinical ordination.
Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…
TO FOCUS ON JEWISH EDUCATION AND SPIRITUALITY AND to engage with the Almighty by means of passionate prayer, to delve into the inner dimensions of the Torah, and to grow in ones relationship with Hashem.
To learn, spread, and study torah
Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students
To expand torah education
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OHR SOMAYACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds ALUMNI OF THE RABBINICAL COLLEGE KNESSETH ISRAEL OF SLABODKA KOWNA ↗
- Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN ↗
- Who funds Bais Yaakov School For Girls ↗
- Who funds KEREN OR INC ↗
- Who funds THE LAURA ROSENBERG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SORALA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HINENI INC ↗
- Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER TORAH ACADEMY ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack and Gitta Nagel Foundation · Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund Inc · Jay Morris Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Morris & Pearl Latt Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morris & Pearl Latt Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Morris & Pearl Latt Family’s filings →