Skip to content

· Private foundation

Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$918k
Granted FY2024still arriving
124
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$316k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.6MPhilanthropy$869kReligion$847kHealth$109kScience & Tech$55kInternational$47kFood & Nutrition$26kHuman Services$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 124 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k107 grants · $170k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $258k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
  • $250k+1 grant · $316k
$1,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL$315,600
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$100,000
FIFTH AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$75,000
RAMAZ SCHOOL$28,000
LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL$26,500
SOUTH FLORIDA ACADEMY FOR SPECIAL NEEDS$25,000
SOUTH FLORIDA JEWISH ACADEMY$25,000
INSTITUTE OF SEMITIC STUDIES$25,000
ALEPH PRESCHOOL OF PALM BEACH$20,000
LUBAVITCH EDUCATION CENTER$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN$20,000
COLEL CHABAD$15,000
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$11,800
CONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN$11,800
PALM BEACH JEWISH CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OHEL CHILDRENDS HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 20%OHEL CHILDRENDS HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 20%OHEL CHILDRENDS HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 20%OHEL CHILDRENDS HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 20%MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $1k → 17%MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $1k → 17%MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $1k → 17%MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $1k → 17%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $750 → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 91 repeat orgs$327k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

91 repeat relationships: 80 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

91
18

Total granted

$3.4M
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+4%

Still filing today

48%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24
InternationalPhilanthropyEducationReligionHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $345k · revenue +46%
  • JH
    JW HELLER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $130k · revenue +171% · 62% of their budget
  • DF
    D&D FAMILY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2022 · $55k · revenue +106% · 83% of their budget

Funded once

  • JE
    JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA
    one grant, 2022 · $38k · revenue +19%
  • MJ
    MORTIMER J & EUGENIE ALTER PROPP FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -81%
  • MJ
    MORTIMER J PROPP LEGACY FOR ORTHODOX HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +136%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
6
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
7
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
8
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
9
Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
10
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Jewish Life Foundation
—
12
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Linsone Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/78
Grantees still filing
44/78
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL: $1,048,600 · OtherWESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOLPALM BEACH JEWISH CENTER INC: $220,000 · OtherPALM BEACH JEWISH CENTER INCRAMAZ SCHOOL: $215,500 · OtherRAMAZ SCHOOLJW HELLER FOUNDATION: $130,000 · OtherSOUTH FLORIDA ACADEMY FOR SPECIAL NEEDS: $125,000 · OtherJEWISH CENTER: $100,000 · Other+95 more: $743,800 · Other+95 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $345,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FED…MARNI & MORRIS PROPP II FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 · PhilanthropyMARNI & MORRIS PROPP II …THE EPHRAIM AND GAIL PROPP FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 · PhilanthropyTHE EPHRAIM AND GAIL PRO…D&D FAMILY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · PhilanthropyD&D FAMILY FOUNDATIONRODNEY M PROPP FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyRODNEY M PROPP FOUNDATIO…JAMES S PROPP FOUNDATION: $55,000 · PhilanthropyJAMES S PROPP FOUNDATIONMORTIMER J & EUGENIE ALTER PROPP FUND: $30,000 · PhilanthropyMORTIMER J PROPP LEGACY FOR ORTHODOX HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS INC: $30,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $15,750 · PhilanthropyLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $48,500 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $33,200 · EducationSouth Florida Academy of Learning Inc: $25,000 · EducationBais Yaakov School For Girls: $22,500 · EducationRABBI ISAAC ELCHANAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $20,000 · EducationKEREN OR INC: $14,400 · Education+4 more: $12,900 · EducationEZER MIZION: $18,600 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $14,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $9,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC: $9,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $6,800 · InternationalEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $4,000 · International+8 more: $7,000 · InternationalJEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $37,500 · ReligionOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $7,200 · ReligionNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $7,200 · ReligionYeshiva Gedolah of Elkins Park: $4,000 · ReligionZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $4,000 · Religion+4 more: $6,000 · ReligionFARM SHARE INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCHAI LIFELINE INC: $7,200 · HealthUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $4,000 · HealthSharsheret Inc: $3,600 · HealthJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,500 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Health+2 more: $750 · Health
Other$2,582,900Philanthropy$825,750Education$176,500International$68,900Religion$65,900Food & Nutrition$26,000Health$18,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $345,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJW HELLER FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 2y, 62% of budgetTHE EPHRAIM AND GAIL PROPP FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetD&D FAMILY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 83% of budgetRODNEY M PROPP FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 2y, 74% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SEMITIC STUDIES INC: $55,000 over 4y, 41% of budgetJAMES S PROPP FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $48,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $37,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $33,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMORTIMER J PROPP LEGACY FOR ORTHODOX HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetSouth Florida Academy of Learning Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFARM SHARE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBais Yaakov School For Girls: $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRABBI ISAAC ELCHANAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $18,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSTRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN OR INC: $14,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC: $14,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RABBI DR LEO JUNG MEMORIAL FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $9,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $7,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $7,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $7,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance Inc: $7,200 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $6,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHINENI INC: $5,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $4,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $4,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF JACKSON INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $3,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $2,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Livnot ULehibanot: $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH SCHOOLS FOR ISRAEL: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JW HELLER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARNI & MORRIS PROPP II FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EPHRAIM AND GAIL PROPP FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds D&D FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RODNEY M PROPP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF SEMITIC STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES S PROPP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MORTIMER J & EUGENIE ALTER PROPP FUND ↗
  • Who funds MORTIMER J PROPP LEGACY FOR ORTHODOX HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds South Florida Academy of Learning Inc ↗
  • Who funds FARM SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Bais Yaakov School For Girls ↗
  • Who funds RABBI ISAAC ELCHANAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
  • Who funds STRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN OR INC ↗
  • Who funds BEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RABBI DR LEO JUNG MEMORIAL FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY41.5× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Propp Foundation Inc · Fjc · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Ojc Fund · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Richard Hirsch Foundation · The Ephraim and Gail Propp Family Foundation Inc · Cd Foundation · Mortimer J & Eugenie Alter Propp Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Farm Share Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Bais Yaakov of Jackson Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 153 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morris & Anna Propp Sons’ filings →

More from the funding graph