Skip to content
Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation

To support continuous improvement of the health status of residents of the tulsa, oklahoma metropolitan statistical area with primary focus on indigent healthcare and women's and children's health services.

$5.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$20MHuman Services$4.3MFood & Nutrition$3.7MEducation$2.9MCrime & Legal$2.0MEmployment$1.0MPhilanthropy$551kHousing & Shelter$471kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $276k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.4M
$75,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$108M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COUNSELING AND RECOVERY SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA$1,000,000
HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC$600,000
FAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC$500,000
SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INTITATIVE$400,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION$356,000
GATESWAY FOUNDATION INC$300,000
CROSSOVER HEALTH SERVICES INC$250,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA$226,765
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$225,000
AMPLIFY INC$175,000
BLACK WALL STREET BUSINESS CENTER$154,000
OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN$150,000
LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE$150,000
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$150,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $242k → 9%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES INC: $100k → 14%FLOURISH HOMES: $30k → 14%GATESWAY FOUNDATION INC: $300k → 15%HAPPY HANDS EDUCATION CENTER INC: $98k → 15%HAPPY HANDS EDUCATION CENTER: $36k → 15%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%EASTERN OKLAHOMA DONATED DENTAL SVCS INC: $90k → 15%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 16%EASTERN OKLAHOMA DONATED DENTAL SERVICES INC: $90k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $250k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $50k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $50k → 15%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $175k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $43k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA WOMENS SHELTER INC: $30k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA SHELTER INC: $30k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $100k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $100k → 15%AMPLIFY INC: $175k → 15%COMMUNITY SERVICE COUNCIL OF GREATER TULSA: $159k → 15%AMPLIFY INC: $125k → 15%AMPLIFY INC: $125k → 15%AMPLIFY INC: $125k → 15%TULSA CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT TEEN PREGNANCY INC: $100k → 15%AMPLIFY INCORPORATED: $100k → 15%TULSA CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT TEEN PREGNANCY: $100k → 15%TULSA CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT TEEN PREGNANCY: $100k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $50k → 15%MODUS INC: $35k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $150k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $80k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $70k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $50k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $250k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $150k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $50k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $600k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $221k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA: $150k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $100k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $55k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $500k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $45k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Morningcrest Healthcare Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26M · 44 repeat orgs$7.8M to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
24

Total granted

$26M
$6.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+43%

Still filing today

98%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +42%
  • SC
    SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +548% · 70% of their budget
  • MH
    Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma
    4× · 2017–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +177%

Funded once

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3.0M · revenue +43%
  • A NEW LEAF INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +56%
  • Morton Comprehensive Health Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
2
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
3
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
4
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
5
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
6
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
7
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
8
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
9
Indian Health Care Resource Center Inc

To empower the american indian through exceptional healthcare.

Health
10
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
11
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
12
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is The Demand Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
77/78
Grantees still filing
51/78
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC: $2,822,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INCMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $1,500,000 · HealthMental Health Association in Tul…Parkside Inc: $1,333,835 · HealthParkside IncCOUNSELING & RECOVERY SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,100,000 · HealthCOUNSELING & RECOVERY SERVICES O…OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $1,050,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $620,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS &…+10 more: $1,909,300 · Health+10 moreOklahoma State University Foundation: $3,000,000 · EducationOklahoma State University…SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC: $2,004,000 · EducationSPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,500,172 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FO…The University of Tulsa: $1,149,000 · EducationThe University of Tulsa+3 more: $375,000 · EducationAmplify Inc: $950,000 · Human ServicesAmplify IncLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $920,600 · Human ServicesLIFE SENIOR SERVICE…Family & Childrens Services Inc: $600,000 · Human ServicesFamily & Childrens …THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $592,632 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHR…CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $450,000 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER COMMUNITY…Hearts for Hearing Foundation: $350,000 · Human ServicesHearts for Hearing …DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $350,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE I…Gatesway Foundation Inc: $300,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $290,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $242,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse Inc: $210,000 · Human Services+12 more: $969,195 · Human Services+12 moreTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,575,275 · PhilanthropyTULSA COM…TULSA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $450,000 · PhilanthropyTULSA COU…+2 more: $50,827 · PhilanthropyA NEW LEAF INC: $1,000,000 · OtherA NEW LEAF INC12 & 12 INC: $750,000 · Other12 & 12 INCLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $625,000 · OtherLITTLE LIGHT HO…HOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC: $200,000 · OtherTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $471,000 · OtherTULSA DAY CENTE…Project Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home: $295,000 · OtherProject Orphans…NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $315,000 · OtherNEWVIEW OKLAHOM…OKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $200,000 · Other+12 more: $980,075 · Other+12 moreChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $775,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC: $555,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $270,000 · Crime & Legal1ST STEP MALE DIVERSION PROGRAM INC: $255,480 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $35,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $976,765 · Food & NutritionHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $600,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $110,000 · Food & NutritionFood on the Move Inc: $100,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$10,335,135Education$8,028,172Human Services$6,224,427Philanthropy$3,076,102Other$4,836,075Crime & Legal$1,890,480Food & Nutrition$1,786,765

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $3,000,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC: $2,822,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,575,275 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC: $2,004,000 over 5y, 70% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,500,172 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $1,500,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetParkside Inc: $1,333,835 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $1,149,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNSELING & RECOVERY SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,100,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $1,050,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $976,765 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAmplify Inc: $950,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $920,600 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $775,000 over 2y, 10% of budget12 & 12 INC: $750,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $625,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARKANSAS & EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $620,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $600,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $600,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $592,632 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC: $555,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $471,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $450,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTULSA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 2y, 65% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $350,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $350,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $315,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMorton Comprehensive Health Services Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGatesway Foundation Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetProject Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home: $295,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $290,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $275,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $270,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget1ST STEP MALE DIVERSION PROGRAM INC: $255,480 over 5y, 13% of budgetCROSSOVER HEALTH SERVICES INC: $250,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $250,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc: $245,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $242,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $235,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $210,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetHOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC: $200,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $200,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetEASTERN OKLAHOMA DONATED DENTAL SERVICES INC: $180,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCommunity Service Council Inc dba Oklahoma Veterans United: $159,075 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBlack Wall Street Business Center: $154,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetThe Town & Country School Inc: $152,500 over 2y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…George Kaiser Family …The Hardesty Family F…Grace & Franklin Bern…The Gelvin FoundationTulsa Community Found…Mervin Bovaird Founda…The Sharna and Irvin …Ralph and Frances McG…Tulsa Area United WayOneok Foundation IncMaxine and Jack Zarro…
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK122.8× affinity59 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Tulsa Area United Way · Oneok Foundation Inc · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 300%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Association of Conservation Districts Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Morton Comprehensive Health Services Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Community Health Connection Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • Ability Resources Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Ywca Tulsa Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
30get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morningcrest Healthcare’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home