Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Moriah Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$395k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

International$5.5MEducation$4.8MPublic Benefit$2.6MCivil Rights$1.6MPhilanthropy$980kYouth Development$667kArts & Culture$453kHealth$436kOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $403k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+2 grants · $775k
$40,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$67M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ISRAEL FUND$395,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$380,000
CIVIC NEWS COMPANY$227,556
TEACH FOR ALL$150,000
CIVICS UNPLUGGED INC$150,000
NEW CLASSROOMS$150,000
NARRATIVE 4 INC$125,000
CITYTUTOR DC$100,000
EAGLE HILL SCHOOL$100,000
IMENTOR$100,000
FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS$100,000
SOCIAL IMPACT FUND$100,000
CIVIC NATION$75,000
NEW LEADERS INC$75,000
VOTO LATINO$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $339k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AUSTIN AREA URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 10%CHARTING CAREERS INC: $10k → 6%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 19%THORN: $30k → 14%THORN: $20k → 14%THORN: $20k → 14%THORN: $20k → 14%DC ABORTION FUND: $50k → 14%DC ABORTION FUND: $25k → 14%DC ABORTION FUND: $20k → 14%DC ABORTION FUND: $15k → 14%DC ABORTION FUND: $15k → 14%DC ABORTION FUND: $15k → 14%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $25k → 17%RED TENT FUND: $10k → 14%HIDDEN WATER: $8k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 54 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

54 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
58

Total granted

$11M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+0%

Still filing today

83%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $437k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsInternationalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CIVIC NEWS COMPANY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +37%
  • N4
    NARRATIVE 4 INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +93%
  • EH
    EAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $913k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -38%
  • HA
    HEALTH ACCESS FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +101%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
2
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
3
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
4
Center for American Progress

The center for american progress (cap) is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. our aim is…

Civil Rights
5
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
6
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
7
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
8
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
9
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
10
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
11
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grantmakers for Education and the most unlike its peers is Heart of a Nation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Senior Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Immigrant Worker SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%9%<5yr14%15%5–10yr20%26%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr20%31%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/114
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,646

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/113
Grantees still filing
59/113
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CIVIC NEWS COMPANY — $1,224,056 · EducationCIVIC NEWS COMPANYNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC — $800,000 · EducationNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS…TEACH FOR ALL INC — $650,000 · EducationTEACH FOR ALL INCCIVICS UNPLUGGED INC — $510,000 · EducationCIVICS UNPLUGGED INCCITYSCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE — $450,000 · EducationCITYSCHOOLS COLLABORATIVEEDUCATION REFORM NOW INC — $425,000 · EducationEDUCATION REFORM NOW INCNEW LEADERS INC — $275,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACK — $250,000 · Education+20 more — $929,200 · Education+20 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND — $2,945,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDNARRATIVE 4 INC — $1,186,650 · InternationalNARRATIVE 4 INCFUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $700,000 · InternationalFUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC+7 more — $246,565 · InternationalEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC — $912,580 · OtherEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION O…NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES — $250,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FO…THE CENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT — $150,000 · OtherJEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN — $125,000 · OtherDC ABORTION FUND — $140,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND — $150,000 · Other+70 more — $2,003,803 · Other+70 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $1,130,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL …Social Impact Fund — $300,000 · PhilanthropySocial Impa…Goodnation Foundation Inc — $125,000 · PhilanthropyGoodnation …ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD …FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR TH…+5 more — $99,028 · Philanthropy+5 moreIMENTOR INC — $506,584 · Youth DevelopmentCHANGE SUMMER INC — $145,000 · Youth DevelopmentVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · Civil RightsNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $100,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTURY FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 · Civil RightsROCK THE VOTE — $50,000 · Civil RightsFair Elections Center — $50,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE — $40,000 · Civil RightsOUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Civil RightsGLOBAL PROJECT AGAINST HATE AND EXTREMISM INC — $25,000 · Civil Rights+5 more — $48,925 · Civil RightsPIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION — $268,674 · Arts & CultureEDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC — $130,000 · Arts & CultureDUMBARTON ARTS AND EDUCATION INC — $60,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$5,513,256International$5,078,215Other$3,731,383Philanthropy$1,854,028Youth Development$651,584Civil Rights$623,925Arts & Culture$468,674

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $2,945,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetCIVIC NEWS COMPANY — $1,224,056 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetNARRATIVE 4 INC — $1,186,650 over 5y, 16% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $1,130,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC — $912,580 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC — $800,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetFUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $700,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTEACH FOR ALL INC — $650,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCIVICS UNPLUGGED INC — $510,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetIMENTOR INC — $506,584 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCITYSCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE — $450,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetEDUCATION REFORM NOW INC — $425,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSocial Impact Fund — $300,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNEW LEADERS INC — $275,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION — $268,674 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK — $250,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES — $250,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGE SUMMER INC — $145,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetDC ABORTION FUND — $140,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetEDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC — $130,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetGoodnation Foundation Inc — $125,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC — $105,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILLEN BREWER SCHOOL — $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEETING HOUSE FAMILY CENTER INC — $95,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetTHORN — $90,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTRANSCEND INC — $85,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC — $82,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM — $77,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSenator George J Mitchell Scholarship Research Institute — $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCivic Nation — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICA ACHIEVES INC — $75,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CENTURY FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetGOVERN FOR AMERICA INC — $70,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetDUMBARTON ARTS AND EDUCATION INC — $60,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMON DEFENSE EDUCATION FUND INC — $55,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL — $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCK THE VOTE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FELLOWSHIP BMEC INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Gates FoundationJewish Community Fede…Carnegie Corporation …Walton Family Foundat…ImpactassetsincGs Donor Advised Phil…Amalgamated Charitabl…Hopewell FundThe Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundThe William & Flora H…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA26.6× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gates Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Hopewell Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Moriah Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Charting Careers Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Moriah Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Moriah Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 143 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines