Skip to content
Morgan Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Morgan Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
109
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$4.1MEnvironment$2.0MHealth$1.4MHuman Services$1.3MCommunity Improvement$984kPhilanthropy$922kYouth Development$915kArts & Culture$885kOther$0
02FY2024 · 109 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k69 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $593k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.5M
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS FOR A HEALTHY CLIMATE$100,000
HONORING CHOICES$100,000
CITIZENS UTILITY BOARD OF MINNESOTA$100,000
MINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM$100,000
CLIMATE LAND LEADERS$100,000
FARMERS UNION FOUNDATION$100,000
CLEAN UP THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT$100,000
HMONG AMERICAN FARMERS ASSOCIATION$100,000
YELLOW SPRINGS HOME INC$94,874
SAHAN JOURNAL$90,000
ST CLOUD TECHNICAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$75,000
FE Y JUSTICIA$65,000
HOMELESS HELPING HOMELESS$65,000
PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA$60,000
MID-MINNESOTA LEGAL ASSISTANCE INCORPORATED$55,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $864k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KNUTE NELSON: $68k → 9%BOSANA FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%ADELANTE MUJERES: $500 → 8%PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CLARK COUNTY: $1k → 15%LUND FAMILY CENTER INC: $250 → 10%BOSANA FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%OMEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $2k → 14%PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CLARK COUNTY: $250 → 15%ASSOCIATION OF AFRICANS LIVING IN VERMONT: $500 → 10%SPM DISABILITY JUSTICE FUND: $500 → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD: $40k → 11%AVIVO: $30k → 11%AVIVO: $30k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD: $35k → 11%YELLOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 9%MINNESOTA NETWORK OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $70k → 14%MINNESOTA NETWORK OF HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $52k → 14%DAYBREAK INC: $500 → 14%MINNESOTA NETWORK OF HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $39k → 14%ANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE: $15k → 11%DAYBREAK INC: $350 → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $25k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MN: $25k → 14%DAYBREAK INC: $300 → 14%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINNESOTA: $400 → 14%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $80k → 14%ANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE: $2k → 11%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%ANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE: $1k → 11%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%YELLOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $500 → 9%FE Y JUSTICIA: $65k → 11%WHAT WOULD BRI DO INC: $39k → 11%YELLOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY CHILDRENS CENTER: $300 → 9%HOMELESS HELPING HOMELESS: $75k → 11%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $37k → 11%PARAMOUNT CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $28k → 11%QUIET OAKS: $25k → 11%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $10k → 11%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $3k → 11%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $2k → 11%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $2k → 11%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $2k → 11%QUIET OAKS: $2k → 11%PARAMOUNT CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $400 → 11%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $400 → 11%QUIET OAKS HOSPICE HOUSE: $400 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of Morgan Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 24% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 8%.

Morgan Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 141 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

141 repeat relationships: 68 still active in FY2024, 73 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

141
176

Total granted

$13M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+16%

Still filing today

87%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $353k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    Sahan Journal
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +127%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA
    5× · 2019–2024 · $360k · revenue +21%
  • CU
    CLEAN UP THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT
    4× · 2020–2024 · $342k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • CL
    CENTRAL LAKES COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • CM
    CONSERVATION MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -27%
  • CU
    CLEAN UP THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
2
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
4
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
5
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
6
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
7
Community Shares of Minnesota

The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…

—
8
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
9
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
10
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
11
Minnesota Valley Action Council Inc

Develop resources and opportunities which empower people and communities.

Community Improvement
12
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communitygiving; the most unlike its peers is Bosana Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

300 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 300 of the 350 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
69
Early backer (in before they grew)
290/300
Grantees still filing
204/300
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANTIOCH COLLEGE CORPORATION: $2,897,000 · EducationANTIOCH COLLEGE CORPORATIONSahan Journal: $500,000 · EducationSahan JournalFARMERS UNION FOUNDATION: $400,000 · EducationFARMERS UNION FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $230,000 · EducationARTHUR MORGAN SCHOOL INC: $219,075 · EducationST CLOUD TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $203,000 · Education+15 more: $397,105 · Education+15 moreUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $330,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTASt Cloud Area Family YMCA: $227,200 · OtherTO MUCH TALENT: $198,855 · OtherCITIZENS UTILITY BOARD OF MINNESOTA: $300,000 · OtherCITIZENS UTILITY BOARD OF MINNESOTABOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $360,400 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL MINNESOTATHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $180,000 · OtherISAIAH: $210,000 · Other+110 more: $3,571,660 · Other+110 moreCLEAN UP THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT: $341,500 · EnvironmentCLEAN UP …MINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY: $233,100 · EnvironmentMINNESOTA…CLIMATE LAND LEADERS: $200,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE L…HEALTH PROFESSIONALS FOR A HEALTHY CLIMATE: $175,000 · EnvironmentHEALTH PR…FRESH ENERGY: $126,000 · EnvironmentFRESH ENE…MN350: $105,000 · EnvironmentMN350CONSERVATION MINNESOTA: $75,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVAT…+8 more: $58,150 · EnvironmentPROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $270,500 · Human ServicesPROMISE N…MINNESOTA NETWORK OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $160,500 · Human ServicesMINNESOTA…HOMELESS HELPING HOMELESS: $140,000 · Human ServicesHOMELESS …AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $122,500 · Human ServicesAMHERST H…QUIET OAKS: $84,300 · Human ServicesQUIET OAK…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD: $75,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC …Knute Nelson: $68,000 · Human ServicesKnute Nel…FE Y JUSTICIA: $65,000 · Human ServicesFE Y JUST…AVIVO: $60,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $50,500 · Human Services+7 more: $104,925 · Human Services+7 moreHONORING CHOICES: $320,250 · HealthCENTRACARE HEALTH SYSTEM: $222,280 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA: $150,000 · HealthELLISON CENTER: $106,130 · HealthTEREBINTH REFUGE: $85,000 · HealthLighthouse Family Retreat Inc: $40,000 · HealthCENTRACARE CLINIC: $39,484 · Health+10 more: $103,905 · HealthYELLOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $265,150 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITYGIVING: $206,050 · PhilanthropyWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $89,250 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPY OHIO: $24,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $38,000 · PhilanthropySERVEMINNESOTA: $200,000 · Community ImprovementSHARING OUR ROOTS: $175,000 · Community ImprovementINITIATIVE FOUNDATION: $85,500 · Community ImprovementDISTRICT 742 LOCAL EDUCATION ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION: $45,350 · Community ImprovementGREATER ST CLOUD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $30,800 · Community Improvement
Education$4,846,180Other$5,378,115Environment$1,313,750Human Services$1,201,225Health$1,067,049Philanthropy$622,450Community Improvement$536,650

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTIOCH COLLEGE CORPORATION: $2,897,000 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetSahan Journal: $500,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetFARMERS UNION FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $360,400 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCLEAN UP THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT: $341,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $330,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetHONORING CHOICES: $320,250 over 7y, 60% of budgetCITIZENS UTILITY BOARD OF MINNESOTA: $300,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetPROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $270,500 over 6y, 15% of budgetYELLOW SPRINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $265,150 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetMINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY: $233,100 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $230,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSt Cloud Area Family YMCA: $227,200 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetCENTRACARE HEALTH SYSTEM: $222,280 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTHUR MORGAN SCHOOL INC: $219,075 over 6y, 22% of budgetISAIAH: $210,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITYGIVING: $206,050 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST CLOUD TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $203,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetSERVEMINNESOTA: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE LAND LEADERS: $200,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetTO MUCH TALENT: $198,855 over 3y, 35% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $180,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHMONG AMERICAN FARMERS ASSOCIATION: $175,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSHARING OUR ROOTS: $175,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetHEALTH PROFESSIONALS FOR A HEALTHY CLIMATE: $175,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetMID-MINNESOTA LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $172,268 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMINNESOTA NETWORK OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $160,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetHIGHER WORKS COLLABORATIVE: $150,780 over 2y, 34% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA: $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL MINNESOTA COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT ORGANIZATION: $145,200 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetHOMELESS HELPING HOMELESS: $140,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE YES NETWORK: $133,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetJUGAAD LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $130,500 over 4y, 29% of budgetGREAT RIVER EDUCATIONAL ARTS THEATRE: $130,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetFRESH ENERGY: $126,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCLIMATE GENERATION: $125,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $122,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetQUEERSPACE COLLECTIVE: $120,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAREER SOLUTIONS: $110,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetELLISON CENTER: $106,130 over 2y, 25% of budgetYELLOW SPRINGS HOME INC: $105,124 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetMN350: $105,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM: $100,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $96,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MINNESOTA WORKER CENTER: $92,898 over 2y, 31% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $89,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINITIATIVE FOUNDATION: $85,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTEREBINTH REFUGE: $85,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CommunitygivingUnited Way of Central…The McKnight Foundati…Rick and Helga Bauerl…The Dayton FoundationGranite Partners Foun…Dayton Foundation Dep…Otto Bremer TrustSaint Paul & Minnesot…Initiative FoundationFr Bigelow FoundationYellow Springs Commun…
CommunitygivingMN78.5× affinity52 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communitygiving · United Way of Central Minnesota · The McKnight Foundation · Rick and Helga Bauerly Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Granite Partners Foundation of Minnesota Inc · Dayton Foundation Depository · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Initiative Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Yellow Springs Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morgan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morgan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Community Alliance of Tenants: 100% of income from government
  • Partnership for the Delaware Estuary Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Hacienda Community Development Corporation: 48% of income from government
  • Sean Locke 24 Foundation: 21% of income from government
  • Local Motion Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Delaware Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Pear: 1% of income from government
  • Migrant Justice Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
53report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morgan Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Morgan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 350 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morgan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home