Skip to content
Morgan Charitable Foundation Attn Josh Hahn at a glance

· Private foundation

Morgan Charitable Foundation Attn Josh Hahn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$393k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MArts & Culture$350kFood & Nutrition$300kHuman Services$100kHealth$41kEducation$25kPhilanthropy$20kCrime & Legal$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $375k
$75,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION$200,000
STARLIGHT THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY$100,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$75,000
CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL$10,000
NORTHLAND THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $75k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Morgan Charitable Foundation Attn Josh Hahn’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Morgan Charitable Foundation Attn Josh Hahnlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 5 repeat orgs$446k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$1.7M
$436k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+8%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M
  • ST
    STARLIGHT THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $350k · revenue +666%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +10%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE GATEWAY REGION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • RC
    Rhodes College
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

—
3
Kansas City Hospice Inc

To bring expert care, peace of mind, comfort, guidance and hope to people who are affected by serious illness or by grief.

Human Services
4
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
5
Freeman Health System

The mission of freeman health services is to improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, quality healthcare solutions.

Health
6
Freeman Neosho Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, quality healthcare solutions.

Health
7
Bionexus Kc

We inspire thinkers from different disciplines to combine their efforts for a common purpose: healthcare innovation.(continued on schedule o)from bioinformatics to cancer research and beyond, we stimulate collaboration and help bring…

Science & Tech
8
Kansas Recovery Network
Health
9
Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Kansas Insurance & Financial Services Education Foundation
Education
12
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

KU Hillel's mission is to connect Jewish students to each other and to their Judaism, to inspire and equip the next generation of Jewish leaders, and to build a thriving Jewish community on campus.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Rhodes College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION: $1,150,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE RESURRECTIONYOUNG LIFE MIDWEST DEVELOPMENT: $60,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE GATEWAY REGION: $50,000 · Other+4 more: $51,000 · OtherSTARLIGHT THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY INC: $350,000 · Arts & CultureSTARLIGHT THEATRE …HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $300,000 · Food & NutritionHARVESTERS - THE…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $100,000 · Human ServicesRhodes College: $25,000 · EducationNORTHLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $10,000 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $10,000 · HealthSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,311,000Arts & Culture$350,000Food & Nutrition$300,000Human Services$100,000Education$25,000Health$20,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTARLIGHT THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS CITY INC: $350,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRhodes College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKCYM PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morgan Charitable Foundation Attn Josh Hahn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morgan Charitable Foundation Attn Josh Hahn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morgan Charitable Foundation Attn Josh Hahn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home