· Public charity
Jewish Unity International Inc
It shall be the primary purpose of the organization to act as a resource for orthodox jewish outreach organizations committed to reaching all jews regardless of affiliation and instilling a love of judaism and the performance of its commandments through the study of torah.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $707,576 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,128,583 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $421,007 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $180k
- $250k+1 grant · $458k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Orthodox Union | $458,257 |
| American Friends of Achy | $65,580 |
| American Friends of Netiv Aryeh Inc | $58,100 |
| Meorot Inc | $55,900 |
| Friends of Neve College for Women | $20,800 |
| American Friends of Bnot Torah Institute | $17,700 |
| Gates of Zion | $10,730 |
| American Friends of Tomer Devorah Inc | $9,400 |
| Yeshivat Aish HaTorah | $6,100 |
| Batya Girls Inc | $5,009 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $535k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AGAISH GLOBAL INC2× · 2021–2022 · $1.8M · revenue +65%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ACHY2× · 2023–2024 · $113k · revenue +26%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC2× · 2023–2024 · $91k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- TDTORAS DOVID COMMUNITY KOLLELone grant, 2021 · $300k
- TDTORAH DAY SCHOOL OF ATLANTAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $122k · revenue +28%
- YOYESHIVA OHR YISRAEL OF ATLANTA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $98k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
Religious School
Education and religious activities and research
publish religious books
Support of religious schools in Israel
To support jewish religious education
Fostering jewish education and leadership.
None
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Netiv Aryeh Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meor of Boston Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AISH GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds UNION OF ORTHODOX RABBIS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA INC ↗
- Who funds TORAH DAY SCHOOL OF ATLANTA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ACHY ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA OHR YISRAEL OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEOROT YERUSHALAYIM ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC ↗
- Who funds MEOROT INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNOT TORAH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GATES OF ZION INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS AREA TORAH ASSOCIATION BUILDING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE RABINOWITZ INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOUTHERN-TIER TORAH ADVANCEMENT & REVITIZATION ↗
- Who funds MEOR INC ↗
- Who funds MEOR OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TOMER DEVORAH SEMINA RY INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of EshelInc ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT AISH HATORAH ↗
- Who funds THE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC ↗
- Who funds BATYA GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND JEWISH EXPERIENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Morasha Olami Inc · Fjc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Joyce and Ramie Tritt Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jewish Unity International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jewish Unity International Inc?
Find your warmest path to Jewish Unity International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.