Skip to content
Moore Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Moore Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$801kInternational$150kEducation$103kEmployment$33kPhilanthropy$20kHuman Services$4kYouth Development$1kHealth$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$508
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Church At Battlecreek$20,000
Communities Foundation of Oklahoma$10,000
Tulsa Community Foundation$5,005
A New Leaf$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY SQUARE: $500 → 14%JOHN 316 MISSION: $2k → 14%JOHN 316 MISSION: $1k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $200 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$817k · 5 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$817k
$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+6%

Still filing today

80%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BATTLECREEK CHURCH INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $532k
  • Kanakuk Ministries
    4× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +60%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue -121%

Funded once

  • TC
    TC CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $249k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • Tulsa Community College Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +65%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
2
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
The Oklahoma United Methodist Foundation

To create and administer permanent charitable endowments to strengthen Methodist ministries in Oklahoma.

—
4
Oklahoma Baptist University

As a christian liberal arts university, oklahoma baptist university transforms lives by equipping students to pursue academic excellence, integrate faith with all areas of knowledge, engage a diverse world, and live worthy of the high…

Education
5
Pi Beta Phi Foundation of Okc
Philanthropy
6
Community Resources Real Estate

Support the oklahoma city community foundation, inc.

Philanthropy
7
Tulsa County Bar Foundation Inc

To promote ethical conduct among attorneys, to advance the effective administration of our judicial system, to ensure equal access to justice for all citizens and to engender respect for the legal profession, the law and the governing…

Crime & Legal
8
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
9
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
10
Tulsa Community Loan Fund Inc

To support community efforts to provide a greater supply of affordable housing in tulsa county and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
11
Angel Fund Okc Inc
Animals
12
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BATTLECREEK CHURCH INC: $531,500 · OtherBATTLECREEK CHURCH INCTC CHURCH: $249,000 · OtherTC CHURCHA NEW LEAF INC: $32,500 · Other+12 more: $28,406 · OtherKanakuk Ministries: $150,000 · ReligionKanakuk Ministr…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…+2 more: $2,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,005 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyJOHN 316 MISSION: $3,000 · Human ServicesCITYSQUARE: $500 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $200 · Human ServicesBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthNo Boundaries International Inc: $200 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$841,406Religion$150,000Education$102,000Philanthropy$15,105Human Services$3,700Health$500Public Safety & Disaster$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKanakuk Ministries: $150,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $32,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAMMA PHI BETA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYSQUARE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNo Boundaries International Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…Arvest FoundationThe Signatry Charitab…Tulsa Community Found…One Gas Foundation IncServant FoundationRenaissance Charitabl…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Arvest Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Tulsa Community Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moore Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moore Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moore Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home