· Private foundation
Monster Energy Cares
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k96 grants · $98k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $113k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $566k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| High Five Nonprofit Foundation | $150,000 |
| Dawsons Peak | $150,000 |
| The UCI Irvine Foundation | $113,342 |
| 15 and the Mahomies Foundation | $100,000 |
| Good Causes Inc | $53,000 |
| National Multiple Sclerosis Society | $25,000 |
| American Friends of Natal Inc | $20,000 |
| United Way of Greater Kansas City | $15,000 |
| Soroptimist International of Corona | $12,500 |
| Womens Voices Now Inc | $10,000 |
| The 43 Institute | $10,000 |
| Betheseda Teaching Ministry | $10,000 |
| Petersville Community Non Profit Corp | $10,000 |
| National Multiple Sclerosis Society | $6,170 |
| Riverside County Deputy Sheriff Relief Foundation | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
115 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 48 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
HIGH FIVES NONPROFIT FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $375k · revenue +55%- TRTEAM RUBICON INC3× · 2021–2024 · $203k · revenue +18%
- CUCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY2× · 2021–2023 · $141k · revenue +19%
Funded once
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESone grant, 2023 · $322k · revenue -33%
DIRECT RELIEFone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +20%- UOUSO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INCone grant, 2020 · $73k · revenue -68%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…
The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.
Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…
To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Icon Baseball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
298 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 298 of the 393 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 15 AND THE MAHOMIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIGH FIVES NONPROFIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds Dawson's Peak ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ROBERT IRVINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD CAUSES INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THANKS USA ↗
- Who funds USO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF CORONA ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FINALLY HOME ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE STATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC ↗
- Who funds CORONA-NORCO SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Womens Voices Now Inc ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Vets On Track Foundation ↗
- Who funds Corona Police Community Partnership Inc ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc ↗
- Who funds CORONA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PETERSVILLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BOARDING FOR BREAST CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds 43 Institute ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Orange County · Matthew Hill Foundation Inc · Linda I Smith Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Pedigree Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Monster Energy Cares funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Bend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity — 17% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Monster Energy Cares?
Find your warmest path to Monster Energy Cares through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.