Skip to content

· Private foundation

Monimos Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$502k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$242k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$14MEducation$533kInternational$418kEnvironment$379kAnimals$221kFood & Nutrition$120kHealth$103kReligion$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $218k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $242k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONIMOS ART FOUNDATION$241,611
INDEPENDENT SHAKESPEARE COMPANY$25,000
OJAI MUSIC FESTIVAL$20,000
THE COMMITTEE FOR CULTURAL POLICY$20,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$13,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$10,000
ANIMAL OUTLOOK$10,000
DONKEYLAND$10,000
OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY$10,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$10,000
HAPPY VALLEY FOUNDATION$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY$10,000
THE RUBIN MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
CONCERNED RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKERS$10,000
FARM SANCTUARY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELP OF OJAI: $10k → 10%HELP OF OJAI: $10k → 10%HELP OF OJAI: $10k → 10%HELP OF OJAI: $10k → 10%HELP OF OJAI: $5k → 10%HELP OF OJAI: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MI
NY
CA
CO
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Monimos Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Monimos Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 39 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
11

Total granted

$16M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+35%

Still filing today

77%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INDEPENDENT SHAKESPEARE CO INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $470k · revenue +145%
  • TO
    THE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +268%
  • OF
    OJAI FESTIVALS LTD
    7× · 2018–2024 · $140k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
    one grant, 2021 · $37k · revenue +21%
  • BH
    BESANT HILL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • OC
    ODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOLSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
2
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
3
Ojai Valley School

Operation of a boarding school

Education
4
The Institute for Bird Populations

The institute for bird populations enables science-based conservation of species and habitats by studying the abundance, demography, and ecology of birds and other wildlife.

Animals
5
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
6
California Ocean Science Trust

California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…

Environment
7
Oikonos - Ecosystem Knowledge

Oikonos studies and protects imperiled ecosystems by engaging diverse communities through innovative scientific and artistic collaborations.

Science & Tech
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
10
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
11
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
12
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Sanctuary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Monimos Art Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONIMOS ART FOUNDATION: $13,443,449 · Arts & CultureMONIMOS ART FOUNDATION+5 more: $676,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART: $137,000 · OtherTHE COMMITTEE FOR CULTURAL POLICY: $125,000 · OtherMIRACLES: $92,964 · OtherSCHOOL INC: $70,000 · OtherPANCHEN LAMA-TASHI LHUNPO PROJECT: $45,000 · OtherCenter for Regenerative Agriculture: $50,000 · OtherHELP OF OJAI INC: $46,000 · Other+13 more: $109,500 · OtherHAPPY VALLEY FOUNDATION: $140,000 · EducationSiddhartha School Partnership: $110,000 · EducationFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $70,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $70,000 · EducationOAK GROVE SCHOOL LLC: $46,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $37,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $120,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $120,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET: $85,000 · InternationalBULLETIN OF THE ASIA INSTITUTE: $80,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalTHE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY: $170,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $115,000 · EnvironmentVENTURA LAND TRUST: $40,000 · EnvironmentLOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentOjai Raptor Center: $20,000 · Environment+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $80,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC: $40,000 · AnimalsANIMAL OUTLOOK INC: $40,000 · AnimalsTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · AnimalsDonkeyLand: $10,000 · Animals+1 more: $6,000 · AnimalsRUBIN MUSEUM OF ART AKA THE SHELLEY & DONALD RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST: $60,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $13,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $9,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$14,119,449Other$675,464Education$483,000International$415,000Environment$380,000Animals$201,000Philanthropy$87,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONIMOS ART FOUNDATION: $13,443,449 over 8y, 100% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT SHAKESPEARE CO INC: $470,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetTHE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY: $170,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetOJAI FESTIVALS LTD: $140,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetHAPPY VALLEY FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSiddhartha School Partnership: $110,000 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET: $85,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $80,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $70,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRUBIN MUSEUM OF ART AKA THE SHELLEY & DONALD RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Regenerative Agriculture: $50,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetHELP OF OJAI INC: $46,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetOAK GROVE SCHOOL LLC: $46,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKATHMANDU VALLEY PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $45,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL OUTLOOK INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetVENTURA LAND TRUST: $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC: $30,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOjai Raptor Center: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTIBET HOUSE US INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetConcerned Resource & Environmental Workers: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDonkeyLand: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOJAICARES INC: $8,500 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetTURTLE CONSERVANCY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOjai Film Society: $5,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EASTERN CALIFORNIA MUSEUM: $4,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetVENTURA COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONIMOS ART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT SHAKESPEARE CO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OJAI FESTIVALS LTD ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Siddhartha School Partnership ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET ↗
  • Who funds BULLETIN OF THE ASIA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds RUBIN MUSEUM OF ART AKA THE SHELLEY & DONALD RUBIN CULTURAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Center for Regenerative Agriculture ↗
  • Who funds HELP OF OJAI INC ↗
  • Who funds OAK GROVE SCHOOL LLC ↗
  • Who funds KATHMANDU VALLEY PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL OUTLOOK INC ↗
  • Who funds VENTURA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ojai Raptor Center ↗
  • Who funds TIBET HOUSE US INC ↗
  • Who funds Concerned Resource & Environmental Workers ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds DonkeyLand ↗
  • Who funds ODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA25× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Ventura County Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Shanbrom Family Foundation · John J Moller Family Foundation · David & Sylvia Weisz Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Finch Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monimos Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monimos Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Monimos Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Monimos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Monimos’ filings →

    More from the funding graph