· Private foundation
John J Moller Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $88k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RAINFOREST TRUST | $34,320 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION | $28,600 |
| CRANE SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS | $10,000 |
| LIGHT THE WORLD INC | $6,800 |
| OUR RESCUE | $6,800 |
| SAN MATEO COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION | $5,720 |
| AMAZON CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION | $5,720 |
| AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $5,720 |
| WILDERNESS YOUTH PROJECT INCORPORATED | $5,720 |
| POLESTAR LIFETIME LEARNING FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC | $4,500 |
| MESA INDEPENDENT LIVING | $1,500 |
| THE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY | $1,500 |
| DIGNITYMOVES | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RTRAINFOREST TRUST5× · 2020–2024 · $116k · revenue +54%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2024 · $94k · revenue +377%
- CCCRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL4× · 2021–2024 · $41k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- TITREEPEOPLE INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $37k · revenue +150%
- BDBEST DAY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $30k
- CLCAPITAL LINK INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.
As the only community foundation for the ocean, The Ocean Foundation's 501(c)(3) mission is to improve global ocean health, climate resilience, and the blue economy. We create partnerships to connect people in the communities in which we…
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.
To mobilize people in local communities around the world to protect marine wildlife and the oceans and inland watersheds that sustain them.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.
Rainforest Action Network (RAN) works toward a world where the rights and dignity of all communities are respected and where healthy forests, a stable climate and wild biodiversity are protected and celebrated.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Wildtorium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Concerned Resource & Environmental Workers ↗
- Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds BEST DAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL LINK INC ↗
- Who funds KRISHNAMURTI FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds VENTURA LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OJAI VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GREATER GOODS OJAI ↗
- Who funds WILDTORIUM ↗
- Who funds RAIN COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds HEAL THE OCEAN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds OPERATION OPEN WATER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HOMES ↗
- Who funds SECURE BEGINNINGS ↗
- Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX BREAD RISING ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KOKUA HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONICA ROS SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds OCEANIC GLOBAL FOUNDATION CORP ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAN MATEO COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Wilderness Youth Project Inc ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Patricia Bragg Foundation · Ventura County Community Foundation · 2005 Tomchin Family Charitable Trust · The Turpin-Allebrand Family Charitable Foundation · The B & B Foundation · James S Bower Foundation · Manitou Fund · Bruce and Marilyn Wallace Foundation · Monimos Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John J Moller Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Capital Link Inc — 18% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.