· Private foundation
Monarch Beverage Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HENDRICKS COMMUNITY SOCCER | $3,510 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $3,000 |
| TEAM RED WHITE AND BLUE | $2,500 |
| TOYS FOR TOTS | $1,858 |
| BROWNSBURG JUNIOR FOOTBALL LEAGUE | $1,500 |
| LA LIGA PEQUENA | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| TRAVELER'S REST MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH | $1,000 |
| JAY COUNTY SPECIAL OLYMPICS | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| GIBAULT INC | $1,000 |
| PATACHOU FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| JANUS DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC | $1,000 |
| DATHOUSE INC | $750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2020, 13 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHENDRICKS COMMUNITY SOCCER INC3× · 2018–2020 · $5k · revenue +100%
- MTMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +59%
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +7%
Funded once
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +34%- ZPZERO PROSTATE CANCERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +104%
- TRTHE RUSS DELLEN MEMORIAL LOOP FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -98%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Whas Crusade for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Newburgh Elementary School Pat Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HENDRICKS COMMUNITY SOCCER INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis ↗
- Who funds SOUTH MADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HARMONY SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The Path Home Inc ↗
- Who funds ANGELMAN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds REDEMPTION RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DATHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ZERO PROSTATE CANCER ↗
- Who funds THE RUSS DELLEN MEMORIAL LOOP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A LONGER TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds JANUS DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HOPE OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE WHAS CRUSADE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Gibault Inc ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds Indy Honor Flight Inc ↗
- Who funds DOVE RECOVERY HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds Brownsburg Band & Orchestra Parents Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Pacers Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Salesforce Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Monarch Beverage Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Monarch Beverage Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Monarch Beverage Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.