Skip to content
Mockbee Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mockbee Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$18kHuman Services$6kHousing & Shelter$4kEnvironment$4kFood & Nutrition$3kPhilanthropy$2kReligion$1kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$124k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCESS INC$4,000
BATH COMMUNITY FUND CO AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,000
ACH FOUNDATION$1,700
STEPHEN A COMUNALE JR FAMILY CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000
AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPEN M: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 6 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$26k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+19%

Still filing today

83%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ACCESS INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +178%
  • TS
    THE STEPHEN A COMUNALE JR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +445%
  • AR
    AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK
    3× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • DH
    DIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -65%
  • CT
    COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT GREEN SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • GS
    GREEN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Direction Home Akron Canton Area Agency On Aging

Direction home akron canton area agency on aging & disabilities provides older adults, people with disabilities and their caregivers long-term care choices and consumer protection so they can achieve the highest quality of life.

Human Services
2
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron

To improve the health of children, teenagers and young adults through excellence in patient care, education, research, advocacy and community partnerships.

Health
4
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

—
5
Southern Ohio Medical Center

At somc, our mission is to make a difference. we strive to live out that mission by providing our region with the highest quality of care, delivered by professionals who are among the best in their fields. we extend that care and passion…

Health
6
Atrium Medical Center

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
7
Ashtabula County Medical Center

Ashtabula county medical center provides quality healthcare to positively impact the health of our community.

Health
8
Akron Community Foundation

To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…

Philanthropy
9
Trinity Health System Group

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
10
Akron Aids Collaborative

The organization's primary purpose is to broaden the network of caring organizations in the community, to influence social norms that contribute to the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS and to increase advocacy for social services for…

Human Services
11
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
12
Stroke Outcomes and Continuum of Ca
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Direction Home Akron Canton Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Stephen a Comunale Jr Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACCESS INC: $4,475 · OtherACCESS INCACH FOUNDATION: $2,700 · OtherACH FOUNDATIONBATH COMMUNITY FUND CO AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherBATH COMMUNITY FUND CO AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDA…COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT GREEN SCHOOLS: $1,500 · OtherCOMMITTEE TO SUPPORT GREEN SCHOOLSGREEN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,200 · OtherGREEN SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONCUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · OtherCUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCYSUMMA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherSUMMA FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF RICHFIELD HERITAGE PRESERVE: $1,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF RICHFIELD HERITAGE PRESERVE+2 more: $975 · Other+2 moreSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $8,000 · HealthSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIA…AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4,500 · HealthAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncPORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $500 · HealthTHE STEPHEN A COMUNALE JR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3,200 · PhilanthropyTHE STEPHEN A COM…DIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON FOUNDATION: $2,050 · PhilanthropyDIRECTION HOME AK…THE AKRON MARATHON CHARITABLE CORPORATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE AKRON MARATHO…AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $2,700 · Food & NutritionOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$15,850Health$14,000Philanthropy$6,250Food & Nutrition$2,700Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS INC: $4,475 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STEPHEN A COMUNALE JR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $2,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON FOUNDATION: $2,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AKRON MARATHON CHARITABLE CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPORTAGE PATH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community Found…Lehner Family Foundat…The Welty Family Foun…United Way of Summit …Kenneth L Calhoun Cha…L R Moffitt & L W Mof…Northern Ohio Golf Ch…Sisler McFawn Foundat…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Akron Community FoundationOH17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Lehner Family Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Kenneth L Calhoun Char Tr · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mockbee Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mockbee Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mockbee Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home