Skip to content
Mission Triangle Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Mission Triangle Inc

Provide advice and assistance to other non-profits regarding proper governance, mission-setting, strategic planning, operational management, fundraising, financial management, etc.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$135kCommunity Improvement$39kInternational$34kHealth$33kYouth Development$14kEducation$13k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $21,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $24,743 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,643 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$482k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY$7,500
ACADEMY31$7,500
SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN$6,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE: $23k → 8%REFUGEE HOPE PARTNERS: $46k → 8%GLOBAL HOPE INDIA: $8k → 8%SHIP COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $39k → 8%MADE 4 ME: $49k → 8%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elevateher International Ministries

mission is to empower women to heal from trauma, grow in faith, and thrive in purpose, fully realizing their full potential

—
2
Faith Hope and Love Christian Ministries

Faith Hope and Love Christian Ministries exist to glorify God by proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ, nurturing spiritual growth, strengthening families, and serving our community with faith, hope, and love.

Religion
3
Restoration House of Greater Kansas City

ReHope empowers and elevates survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation through its faith-based, trauma-informed residence and recovery programs.

Housing & Shelter
4
Basic of High Point Nc

Buidling selfesteem,motivtional skills

Community Improvement
5
Freedom House

Freedom house is a long-term, addiction-recovery program that rescues, restores, and redeems the lives of women and their children in a christ- centered, family environment. in july 2006, freedom house admitted its first residents and…

Health
6
Life Ministries Christian Academy

To improve standard of living of women

Religion
7
Durham Home Inc
—
8
Gilead House

Gilead House is a privately funded nonprofit that accepts no federal money, allowing us to remain mission driven and deeply responsive to the women and children we serve. Most of our residents are survivors of domestic violence who are…

Housing & Shelter
9
Partners in Hope
Philanthropy
10
Project Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home

We exist to provide: 1. Community development & care to orphans, vulnerable children, powerless young-women and broken families located in Uganda, Africa. 2. The highest quality residential care for girls needing placement outside their…

Religion
11
Hope for the Fatherless

HFTF serves orphaned and vulnerable children in Ethiopia, and its mission is to see every child thriving in a loving family. HFTF accomplishes this through five primary initiatives: in-country adoption training and placement, family…

International
12
Stories Made New

A residential home of discipleship ministry and personal development for young women ages 18-40.To bring single women who are struggling into fulfillment and purpose in Jesus Christ.To help them deal with and work through life dominating…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The No Woman No Girl Initiative; the most unlike its peers is Made4me. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Made4me: $48,967 · Human ServicesMade4meRefugee Hope Partners Inc: $45,921 · Human ServicesRefugee Hope Partners IncTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $38,896 · Human ServicesTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INCTHE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE: $22,606 · Human ServicesTHE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVEGLOBAL HOPE INDIA: $8,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $6,100 · Human ServicesHOPE REINS: $32,512 · HealthHOPE REINSINVISIBLE GIRL PROJECT: $26,321 · InternationalINVISIBLE G…THE CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY: $7,500 · EducationAcademy31 Inc: $7,500 · EducationPRISON ALLIANCE INC: $5,500 · EducationREVIVE HER MINISTRIES INC: $11,548 · ReligionHOPE AND VINE: $6,000 · Public Benefit
Human Services$170,490Health$32,512International$26,321Education$20,500Religion$11,548Public Benefit$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMade4me: $48,967 over 1y, 41% of budgetRefugee Hope Partners Inc: $45,921 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $38,896 over 1y, 18% of budgetHOPE REINS: $32,512 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetINVISIBLE GIRL PROJECT: $26,321 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE: $22,606 over 1y, 16% of budgetREVIVE HER MINISTRIES INC: $11,548 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetGLOBAL HOPE INDIA: $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAcademy31 Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $6,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE AND VINE: $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPRISON ALLIANCE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…Natl Christian Charit…Crossroads Fellowship…Raymond James Charita…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Crossroads Fellowship Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mission Triangle Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mission Triangle Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mission Triangle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home