Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Mission Triangle Inc

Provide advice and assistance to other non-profits regarding proper governance, mission-setting, strategic planning, operational management, fundraising, financial management, etc.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Human Services$135kCommunity Improvement$39kInternational$34kHealth$33kYouth Development$14kEducation$13k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $21,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $24,743 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,643 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$482k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACADEMY31$7,500
CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY$7,500
SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN$6,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE: $23k → 8%REFUGEE HOPE PARTNERS: $46k → 8%GLOBAL HOPE INDIA: $8k → 8%SHIP COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $39k → 8%MADE 4 ME: $49k → 8%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainbow of Hope

Providing a Christian Home environment for women and girls who are hurting mentally, relationally, emotionally, or spiritually. Restoring them to functional Christian family and church lifestyle by providing Bible-based mentoring and…

—
2
House of Hope International

See schedule oour mission is the integration of women and children into society, transformed through the power of healing and complete discipleship and vocational training within a safe, loving, and serving community. our vision is to see…

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Elevateher International Ministries

mission is to empower women to heal from trauma, grow in faith, and thrive in purpose, fully realizing their full potential

—
4
House of Hope of Nc Inc

Home, Counseling & Support for Hurting Teens

Education
5
Hope Alive Inc

Christ-based ministry with the mission of bringing hope and encouragement with christ-like love to emotionally hurting people through mental health counseling and transitonal housing for homeless women with mental illness.

—
6
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
7
Rahab House

Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…

Human Services
8
Vision of Hope Ministries Inc

Recognize the worth and sanctity of human life by ministering to young women, children, and families in a christ-centered environment. offer a faith-based residential treatment program for girls age 14-28 struggling with: unplanned…

Health
9
Redemption Ridge

Redemption Ridge is dedicated to bringing hope and healing to young girls rescued from the horrendous world of sex trafficking. We are committed to redeeming lives, restoring dignity and placing purpose in hearts of these precious children.

—
10
Alive At Last

Alive at Last helps victims of sexual exploitation and trafficking live free and discover their God-given purpose.

Crime & Legal
11
Grace Collective

Grace Collective is a nonprofit that offers hope and opportunity for lasting change to women survivors of poverty and exploitation. We do this by fostering a community of grace and holistic care where women learn job and life skills that…

Employment
12
Girls Hope Rescue Mission

To rescue Kenyan Girls from GBV

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prison Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Made4me. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Made4me — $48,967 · Human ServicesMade4meRefugee Hope Partners Inc — $45,921 · Human ServicesRefugee Hope Partners IncTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $38,896 · Human ServicesTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INCTHE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE — $22,606 · Human ServicesTHE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVEGLOBAL HOPE INDIA — $8,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE — $6,100 · Human ServicesHOPE REINS — $32,512 · HealthHOPE REINSINVISIBLE GIRL PROJECT — $26,321 · InternationalINVISIBLE G…Academy31 Inc — $7,500 · EducationTHE CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY — $7,500 · EducationPRISON ALLIANCE INC — $5,500 · EducationREVIVE HER MINISTRIES INC — $11,548 · ReligionHOPE AND VINE — $6,000 · Public Benefit
Human Services$170,490Health$32,512International$26,321Education$20,500Religion$11,548Public Benefit$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMade4me — $48,967 over 1y, 41% of budgetRefugee Hope Partners Inc — $45,921 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $38,896 over 1y, 18% of budgetHOPE REINS — $32,512 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetINVISIBLE GIRL PROJECT — $26,321 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE NO WOMAN NO GIRL INITIATIVE — $22,606 over 1y, 16% of budgetREVIVE HER MINISTRIES INC — $11,548 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetGLOBAL HOPE INDIA — $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAcademy31 Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE — $6,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE AND VINE — $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPRISON ALLIANCE INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…Natl Christian Charit…Crossroads Fellowship…Raymond James Charita…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Crossroads Fellowship Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mission Triangle Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines