Skip to content
Mission Projects Fellowship Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mission Projects Fellowship Inc

Funding of equipment for missionaries.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$472kInternational$287kHuman Services$20kArts & Culture$16kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $58,011, the rows itemized in this filing. The $99,445 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $41,434 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$12,472
Median grant
5
States reached
$60k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOURCE OF LIGHT MINISTRIES$15,000
CHRISTIAN AID MISSION$13,979
REACHING AFRICA'S UNREACHED$12,472
THUNDERZOLL INC$6,000
PAK7$5,390
GOSPELINK$5,170
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%REFUGE FOR THE POOR: $15k → 10%THUNDERZOLL INC: $8k → 5%HOPE'S PROMISE: $10k → 3%ORPHANETWORK: $39k → 10%THUNDERZOLL INC: $6k → 5%ORPHANETWORK: $15k → 10%THUNDERZOLL INC: $6k → 5%THUNDERZOLL INC: $6k → 5%RISHAMA INTERNATIONAL: $18k → 7%RISHAMA INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$615k · 20 repeat orgs$244k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$615k
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

70%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    MISSION EURASIA
    4× · 2017–2022 · $58k · revenue +180%
  • OW
    ONE WAY MINISTRIES
    3× · 2019–2022 · $40k · revenue +100%
  • CF
    CHARIOTS FOR HOPE INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $34k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • FO
    FIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -4%
  • RF
    REFUGE FOR THE POOR
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +22%
  • BH
    BOLD HOPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
2
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

—
3
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
4
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
5
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
6
Christian Ministries International
—
7
Kings Commission Ministries

Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…

—
8
One With God

To teach the bible to pastors and church leaders in africa and asia, while funding food for orphaned and abandonded children

Health
9
Christian Literature for Africa

Literature for africa

Religion
10
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
11
Christian Mission Charities Inc

Christian support for third world countr

International
12
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Eurasia; the most unlike its peers is Thunderzoll Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
17/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UIM INTERNATIONAL: $40,186 · OtherUIM INTERNATIONALCEF MINISTRIES: $29,800 · OtherCEF MINISTRIESTHE MAILBOX CLUB INC: $29,000 · OtherTHE MAILBOX CLUB INCCHRISTIAN AID MISSION: $28,979 · OtherCHRISTIAN AID MISSIONBCM INTERNATIONAL INC: $17,440 · OtherBCM INTERNATIONAL INCCLC Ministries International: $16,678 · OtherCLC Ministries InternationalFAITH COMES BY HEARING: $15,497 · OtherSOURCE OF LIGHT MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · OtherAFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $13,724 · OtherPRIORITY ONE INDIA USA: $13,259 · Other+10 more: $84,242 · Other+10 moreMISSION EURASIA: $57,540 · ReligionMISSION EURASIAONE WAY MINISTRIES: $39,617 · ReligionONE WAY MINISTRIESSAT-7 NORTH AMERICA: $31,486 · ReligionSAT-7 NORTH AMERICAREACHING AFRICA'S UNREACHED: $12,472 · ReligionREACHING AFRICA'S UNRE…AFRICAN CHILDREN'S MISSION INC: $10,000 · ReligionAFRICAN CHILDREN'S MIS…Marine Reach - Family Care Centre: $8,333 · Religion+2 more: $10,560 · Religion+2 moreCHRISTIAN MISSION FOR THE DEAF: $36,687 · InternationalCHRISTIAN MISSION F…CHARIOTS FOR HOPE INC: $34,221 · InternationalCHARIOTS FOR HOPE I…ANANIAS HOUSE: $16,850 · InternationalANANIAS HOUSEFIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION: $15,000 · InternationalFIELDS OF ABUNDANCE…BOLD HOPE INC: $14,300 · InternationalBOLD HOPE INCLIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $11,828 · InternationalLIVING HOPE INTERNA…MCM INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 · InternationalMCM INTERNATIONALEl Alfarero USA: $8,800 · InternationalEl Alfarero USAThe Orphanetwork: $54,219 · Human ServicesThe OrphanetworkTHUNDERZOLL INC: $26,500 · Human ServicesTHUNDERZOLL INCRishama International: $25,990 · Human ServicesRishama Internatio…REFUGE FOR THE POOR: $14,700 · Human ServicesREFUGE FOR THE POO…HOPE'S PROMISE INC: $9,520 · Human ServicesHOPE'S PROMISE INCHorizons International: $7,409 · Human ServicesHorizons Internati…The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $34,063 · PhilanthropyCHRISTIAN WORLD OUTREACH: $33,747 · EmploymentCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC: $33,000 · Youth Development
Other$303,805Religion$170,008International$146,686Human Services$138,338Philanthropy$34,063Employment$33,747Youth Development$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSION EURASIA: $57,540 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Orphanetwork: $54,219 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetONE WAY MINISTRIES: $39,617 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN MISSION FOR THE DEAF: $36,687 over 3y, 20% of budgetCHARIOTS FOR HOPE INC: $34,221 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $34,063 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN WORLD OUTREACH: $33,747 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC: $33,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAT-7 NORTH AMERICA: $31,486 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAILBOX CLUB INC: $29,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHUNDERZOLL INC: $26,500 over 4y, 12% of budgetRishama International: $25,990 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetANANIAS HOUSE: $16,850 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCLC Ministries International: $16,678 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION: $15,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetREFUGE FOR THE POOR: $14,700 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBOLD HOPE INC: $14,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPRIORITY ONE INDIA USA: $13,259 over 1y, 14% of budgetREACHING AFRICA'S UNREACHED: $12,472 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAFRICAN CHILDREN'S MISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCENTRO SHALOM TIJUANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetLIVE EAR MINISTRES: $9,800 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetHOPE'S PROMISE INC: $9,520 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMCM INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMarine Reach - Family Care Centre: $8,333 over 1y, 12% of budgetHorizons International: $7,409 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAK7 US Inc: $5,390 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bolick FoundationTyndale House Ministr…Christian Community F…The Maclellan Foundat…From His Hand Foundat…Servant FoundationGordon Christian TrustInternational Generos…Eden Bridge FoundationNatl Christian Charit…The Signatry Charitab…The US Charitable Gif…
The Bolick FoundationNC23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bolick Foundation · Tyndale House Ministries · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · From His Hand Foundation · Servant Foundation · Gordon Christian Trust · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Eden Bridge Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The US Charitable Gift Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mission Projects Fellowship Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mission Projects Fellowship Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mission Projects Fellowship Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mission Projects Fellowship Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mission Projects Fellowship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home