Skip to content

California · Public charity

Mission Produce Foundation

The organization's purpose is to improve living standards within the community through education, training, nourishment and support.

$82k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
71%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$59k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$37,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 14
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$53k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 71% of the organizations Mission Produce Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 35% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$59k25%
FY20247$73k71%
FY20233$55k33%
FY20224$91k50%
FY20211$10k100%
FY20202$13k0%
FY201911$164k45%
FY201814$214kn/a
78% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$270kRecreation & Sports$79kArts & Culture$75kHealth$66kFood & Nutrition$43kEnvironment$20kEducation$15kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families$262,50060%
American Heart Association Inc$49,50040%
Ventura County Fairgrounds Foundation$29,14426%
Rancho Mission Viejo Rodeo Llc$25,0002n/a
Students for Eco-Education and Agriculture Inc$20,00021%
The Reserve at Rancho Mission Viejo$15,0001n/a
Border Olympics Inc$10,00022%
Jacks Helping Hand Inc$7,50011%
Make-A-Wish Foundation of America$6,50010%
California Agricultural Leadership Found$5,50010%
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of Mission Produce Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families$262,50060%
American Heart Association Inc$49,50040%
Ventura County Fairgrounds Foundation$29,14426%
Rancho Mission Viejo Rodeo Llc$25,0002n/a
Students for Eco-Education and Agriculture Inc$20,00021%
The Reserve at Rancho Mission Viejo$15,0001n/a
Border Olympics Inc$10,00022%
Jacks Helping Hand Inc$7,50011%
Make-A-Wish Foundation of America$6,50010%
California Agricultural Leadership Found$5,50010%
Cal Poly Corporation$5,00010%
House Farm Workers$5,00012%
Future Citizens Foundation Dba the First Tee of Monterey County$5,00010%
Young Life$5,00010%
St Bonaventure High School$5,0001n/a
Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc$5,00010%

Plus 13 recipients with no EIN on record ($218k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Mission Produce Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families: $262,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $49,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVentura County Fairgrounds Foundation: $29,144 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetStudents for Eco-Education and Agriculture Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBorder Olympics Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetJacks Helping Hand Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of America: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Agricultural Leadership Found: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCal Poly Corporation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouse Farm Workers: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFuture Citizens Foundation Dba the First Tee of Monterey County: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYoung Life: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mission Produce Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mission Produce Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mission Produce Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Mission Produce Foundation

How much does Mission Produce Foundation give?
Mission Produce Foundation reported 4 itemized grants totaling $59,000, out of $82,300 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 14 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Mission Produce Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (40%), Recreation & Sports (12%), Arts & Culture (11%).
Who are Mission Produce Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families ($263k), American Heart Association Inc ($50k), Ventura County Fairgrounds Foundation ($29k).
Does Mission Produce Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 71% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mission Produce Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include California Community Foundation, American Endowment Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is Mission Produce Foundation based?
Mission Produce Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mission Produce’s filings →

More from the funding graph