Skip to content

· Public charity

Mission Outreach United Appeal Fund Inc

The Fund's purpose is to support the ministries of various Birmingham area social action groups including Canterbury United Methodist Church, Highlands United Methodist Church, Urban Ministry Outreach, Inc., the United Methodist Children's Home, and Camp Sumatanga.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$149kReligion$146kRecreation & Sports$10kCrime & Legal$250
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $38,660, the rows itemized in this filing. The $54,980 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,320 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$8,885
Median grant
1
States reached
$76k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Canterbury United Methodist Church$21,440
Embrace Alabama Kids$8,885
Avondale Samaritan Place$8,335
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%United Methodist Children's Home: $20k → 33%UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $16k → 33%UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $11k → 33%Embrace Alabama Kids: $9k → 33%United Methodist Children's Home: $8k → 33%Urban Ministry: $6k → 16%Urban Ministry: $2k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $1k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $500 → 16%FAIRHAVEN - METHODIST FOUNTAIN OF LOVE: $6k → 16%Fairhaven - Methodist Fountain of Love: $6k → 16%FAIRHAVEN - METHODIST FOUNTAIN OF LOVE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Mission Outreach United Appeal Fund Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 0%.

Mission Outreach United Appeal Fund Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$306k · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$306k
$0

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME
    9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +13%
  • MH
    METHODIST HOME FOR THE AGING DBA METHODIST HOMES CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +56%
  • CA
    Camp & Assembly Commission of the Methodist Churches of North Alabama
    6× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +35%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    05the grantee network

    4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    4/4
    Grantees still filing
    3/4
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Canterbury United Methodist Church: $113,973 · OtherCanterbury United Methodist ChurchAVONDALE SAMARITAN PLACE LLC: $58,874 · OtherAVONDALE SAMARITAN PLACE LLCCHURCH OF THE RECONCILER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $15,216 · OtherCHURCH OF THE RECONCILER UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHIGHLANDS BIRMINGHAM UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10,191 · Other+2 more: $7,041 · OtherUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $64,593 · Human ServicesUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOMEMETHODIST HOME FOR THE AGING DBA METHODIST HOMES CORPORATION: $16,245 · Human ServicesMETHODIST HOME FOR THE AGING DBA …Urban Ministry Inc: $9,691 · Human ServicesUrban Ministry IncCamp & Assembly Commission of the Methodist Churches of North Alabama: $10,191 · Youth Development
    Other$205,295Human Services$90,529Youth Development$10,191

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $64,593 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMETHODIST HOME FOR THE AGING DBA METHODIST HOMES CORPORATION: $16,245 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCamp & Assembly Commission of the Methodist Churches of North Alabama: $10,191 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUrban Ministry Inc: $9,691 over 6y, 0.6% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
    • Who funds METHODIST HOME FOR THE AGING DBA METHODIST HOMES CORPORATION ↗
    • Who funds Camp & Assembly Commission of the Methodist Churches of North Alabama ↗
    • Who funds Urban Ministry Inc ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Mission Outreach United Appeal Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mission Outreach United Appeal Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Mission Outreach United Appeal’s filings →

      More from the funding graph