Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Mission Health System Foundation Inc

See schedule oto support the mission and programs of mission hospital, inc.

$7.8M
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$3.6M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Health$38MPhilanthropy$1.1MRecreation & Sports$24k
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,163,669
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOGWOOD HEALTH TRUST$3,551,440
ANC HEALTHCARE INC$1,886,696
PISGAH HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,163,669
GATEWAY WELLNESS FOUNDATION$613,465
WNC BRIDGE FOUNDATION$578,057
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $613k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GATEWAY WELLNESS FOUNDATION: $613k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$34M · 7 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$34M
$227k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-74%
+136%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MISSION HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $18M · revenue -74%
  • AH
    ANC HEALTHCARE INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $7.2M · revenue -76%
  • WB
    WNC BRIDGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2022 · $6.2M · revenue -33% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $143k · revenue +136%
  • BC
    BUNCOMBE COUNTY SERVICE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
  • EC
    Eblen Charities Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $24k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Anc Mcdowell Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the people of western north carolina and the surrounding region. the entity's operations ceased due to sale of its assets, including the hospital facility, on 2/1/19. the entity is in the process of winding down…

Health
2
Anc Angel Medical Center Inc

To improve the health of the people of western north carolina and the surrounding region. the entity's operations ceased due to sale of its assets, including the hospital facility, on 2/1/19. the entity is in the process of winding down…

Health
3
Anc Blue Ridge Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the people of western north carolina and the surrounding region. the entity's operations ceased due to sale of its assets, including the hospital facility, on 2/1/19. the entity is in the process of winding down…

Health
4
Anc Highlands-Cashiers Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the people of western north carolina and the surrounding region. the entity's operations ceased due to sale of its assets. including the hospital facility, on 2/1/19. the entity is in the process of winding down…

Health
5
Anc Transylvania Community Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the people of western north carolina and the surrounding region. the entity's operations ceased due to sale of its assets, including the hospital facility, on 2/1/19. the entity is in the process of winding down…

Health
6
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
7
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
8
Nantahala Health Foundation

Improving health and well-being for those living in westernmost North Carolina.

Health
9
Western Carolina Medical Society Foundation Inc

Western Carolina Medical Society Foundation is a physician- and community-led organization. Its mission is to address issues of access to quality health care, disparities in health, wellness and prevention.

Health
10
Piedmont Health Foundation
Health
11
Sandhills Community Care Network Inc

Prior to dissolution on July 8, 2019, CCS sought to improve the health and quality of life of the patients it served by collaborating with patients, health care providers, hospitals, health departments, community partners, and departments…

12
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wnc Bridge Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dogwood Health Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MISSION HOSPITAL INC — $17,657,184 · HealthMISSION HOSPITAL INCANC HEALTHCARE INC — $7,248,176 · HealthANC HEALTHCARE INCPisgah Health Foundation — $1,187,982 · Health+1 more — $63,993 · HealthWNC BRIDGE FOUNDATION — $6,210,120 · PhilanthropyWNC BRIDGE FOUNDATIONDOGWOOD HEALTH TRUST — $3,551,440 · PhilanthropyDOGWOOD HEALTH TRUSTTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $569,277 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF W…ANC MISSION MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC — $1,772,488 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR HEALTH LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION — $143,472 · Other+2 more — $84,000 · OtherGATEWAY WELLNESS FOUNDATION — $613,465 · Human ServicesArts For Life — $21,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$26,157,335Philanthropy$10,330,837Other$1,999,960Human Services$613,465Arts & Culture$21,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISSION HOSPITAL INC — $17,657,184 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetANC HEALTHCARE INC — $7,248,176 over 4y, 24% of budgetWNC BRIDGE FOUNDATION — $6,210,120 over 2y, 32% of budgetANC MISSION MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC — $1,772,488 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPisgah Health Foundation — $1,187,982 over 2y, 76% of budgetGATEWAY WELLNESS FOUNDATION — $613,465 over 1y, 43% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HEALTH LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION — $143,472 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMountainCare Inc — $63,993 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEblen Charities Inc — $24,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetArts For Life — $21,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dogwood Health TrustNC17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mission Health System Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph