Skip to content
Miraglo Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Miraglo Foundation

MIRAGLO FOUNDATION has seven specific purposes: (1) to conduct research and/or support research about alternative healing techniques and global healing traditions;(2) to provide education about and increase awareness of alternative healing techniques and global healing traditions; (3) to make grants to medical personnel(including both…

$500k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.6MArts & Culture$216kInternational$171kHuman Services$31kEducation$20kFood & Nutrition$20kHousing & Shelter$17k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $373,504, the rows itemized in this filing. The $499,671 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $126,167 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $304k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUARNERI INTEGRATIVE HEALTH$200,004
ACADEMY OF INTEGRATIVE HEALTH$103,500
HIGH BLUFF ACADEMY FOUNDATION$20,000
FEEDING AMERICA SAN DIEGO$20,000
CHI$13,000
SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE$10,000
TARIQ KHAIMSA FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHI: $30k → 11%CHI: $21k → 11%CHI: $13k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $7k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER CRC: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER CRC: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $70k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

India$50k · 71% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: MEALS · Nursing Education

Switzerland$20k · 29% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: WORLD HEALTH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 9 repeat orgs$377k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$2.7M
$330k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+8%

Still filing today

78%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +8%
  • IM
    ISIGHT MISSIONS INC
    2× · 2018–2022 · $20k · revenue +25%
  • COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • GO
    GLASS ONION PRODUCTIONS
    one grant, 2018 · $161k
  • EP
    EXECUTIVE PROGRAM SERVCS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $55k
  • GI
    GUARNERI INTEGRATIVE HLTH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
3
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
6
Medical Teams International

Medical teams international is a christian humanitarian relief agency focused on providing life-saving medical care for people in crisis.

International
7
Sinai Health System

Sinai health system's mission is to improve the health of the individuals and communities it serves.

Health
8
Health in Harmony

Health in Harmony's mission is to reverse tropical rainforest deforestation for planetary health.

Health
9
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
10
Doctors for You International Co Vistex

To provide sustainable, equitable and effecient health care services to the most vulnerable individuals and communities around the world.

Health
11
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
12
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is Center for Community Solutions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUARNERI INTEGRATIVE HEALTH: $1,792,192 · OtherGUARNERI INTEGRATIVE HEALTHGLASS ONION PRODUCTIONS: $160,500 · OtherGLASS ONION PRODUCTIONSHEALING TOUCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $78,250 · Other+8 more: $216,085 · Other+8 moreACADEMY OF INTEGRATIVE HEALTH & MEDICINE: $587,517 · HealthACADEMY OF INTEGRATIVE …+3 more: $45,338 · Health+3 moreCONSCIOUSNESS AND HEALING INITIATIVE INC: $64,000 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,364 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $12,000 · International
Other$2,247,027Health$632,855Human Services$106,000International$45,364

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACADEMY OF INTEGRATIVE HEALTH & MEDICINE: $587,517 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetHEALING TOUCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $78,250 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetCONSCIOUSNESS AND HEALING INITIATIVE INC: $64,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetNATURAL DOCTORS INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,364 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISIGHT MISSIONS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetSUDANESE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $18,338 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Miraglo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Miraglo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Miraglo Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Miraglo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Miraglo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home