Skip to content

· Private foundation

Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$268k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$272kArts & Culture$267kReligion$176kAnimals$118kEducation$40kEnvironment$25kFood & Nutrition$22kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITY SCHOOL OF CHRISTIANITY$50,000
TRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$34,000
WILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM$30,000
Greater Kansas City CommunityFoundation$22,000
Northeast Kansas City Historical Society$20,000
SAVE THE KC NEON INC$10,700
Clio Foundation of KC$10,000
Operation Wildlife$5,000
Haskell Indian University Foundation$5,000
Pawsperity$5,000
Giving the Basics Inc$5,000
ACLU of Kansas$5,000
Ferris (Joyce) Esophageal Cancer Foundat$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY$5,000
Pet Resource Center$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Pawsperity: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$680k · 24 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$680k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+123%

Still filing today

38%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsCrime & LegalEnvironmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM
    4× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +87%
  • TS
    THE SCHOOLHOUSE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +50% · 26% of their budget
  • PV
    PRAIRIE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • OP
    Overland Park Historical Society Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +600%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Morton County Historical Society Inc

Preservation of historical records and artifacts of morton county, kansas

—
2
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
—
3
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

—
4
Kansas Association of Conservation Districts

Engage in educational, scientific, and governmental efforts to conserve, develop, and improve the use of land, soil, water, plants, animals, and other natural resources within the state of kansas

Community Improvement
5
Franklin County Historical Society

To preserve, present and promote history in Franklin County, Kansas.

—
6
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
7
Hayslope Preservation Historic Fund

Public charity

—
8
Wichita-Sedgwick County Historical Museum Association

To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county

Arts & Culture
9
Leavenworth County Historical Society

The preservation of a victorian house which is a museum and repository for documents and artifacts of leavenworth county,kansas. the preservation of those documents and artifacts. education of historical significance and living history.

Arts & Culture
10
Friends of the Zoo of Kansas City Foundation

The foundation shall further educational and cultural programs relating to zoological activities, establish and maintain zoological facilities, provide for the acquisition and care of species for display and study, and engage in collateral…

Animals
11
Jefferson County Historical Society

To preserve, maintain and restore historical artifacts and information for future generations.

—
12
Kansas City Museum Foundation Inc

The kansas city museum foundation preserves, interprets, and celebrates kansas city through collections, exhibitions, and bold programs that reflect the city's evolution and spirit, and engage visitors in unfolding stories about kansas…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truman Heartland Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Save the Kc Neon Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITY SCHOOL OF CHRISTIANITY: $135,000 · OtherUNITY SCHOOL OF CHRISTIANITYWILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM: $105,000 · OtherWILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAMSTATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF: $53,000 · OtherSTATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OFTHE SCHOOLHOUSE INC: $30,000 · OtherKCPT - KANSAS CITY PBS: $30,000 · OtherPRAIRIE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL FOUNDATION: $28,250 · OtherUNITY SOCIETY OF PRACTICAL CHRISTIANITY: $28,000 · OtherNORTHEAST KANSAS CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20,000 · Other+26 more: $167,500 · Other+26 moreTRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $142,000 · PhilanthropyTRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY F…Greater Kansas City Community Foundation: $122,000 · PhilanthropyGreater Kansas City Communit…JACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $77,500 · Arts & CultureJACKSON COUN…Save the KC Neon Inc: $20,700 · Arts & CultureSave the KC …THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $8,500 · Arts & Culture+4 moreFRIENDS OF LAKESIDE NATURE CENTER INCORPORATED: $25,000 · EnvironmentLegal Aid of Western Missouri: $20,000 · Crime & LegalHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $16,000 · Food & NutritionOPERATION WILDLIFE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsGREAT PLAINS SPCA: $2,000 · AnimalsPAWSPERITY INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$596,750Philanthropy$264,000Arts & Culture$112,700Environment$25,000Crime & Legal$20,000Food & Nutrition$16,000Animals$7,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $142,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $122,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM: $105,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $77,500 over 3y, 33% of budgetTHE SCHOOLHOUSE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetPRAIRIE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL FOUNDATION: $28,250 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKESIDE NATURE CENTER INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetSave the KC Neon Inc: $20,700 over 2y, 17% of budgetLegal Aid of Western Missouri: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetELMWOOD CEMETERY SOCIETY: $8,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KANSAS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOverland Park Historical Society Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHISTORIC KANSAS CITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGREAT PLAINS SPCA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe William Rockhill Nelson Trust: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORNALL-MAJORS HOUSE MUSEUMS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOOLHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LAKESIDE NATURE CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Save the KC Neon Inc ↗
  • Who funds Legal Aid of Western Missouri ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ELMWOOD CEMETERY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAWSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION WILDLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KANSAS ↗
  • Who funds Overland Park Historical Society Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO25.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · The Atterbury Family Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Minnesota Prairie Wind’s filings →

    More from the funding graph