Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$268k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$272kArts & Culture$267kReligion$176kAnimals$118kEducation$40kEnvironment$25kFood & Nutrition$22kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITY SCHOOL OF CHRISTIANITY$50,000
TRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$34,000
WILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM$30,000
Greater Kansas City CommunityFoundation$22,000
Northeast Kansas City Historical Society$20,000
SAVE THE KC NEON INC$10,700
Clio Foundation of KC$10,000
UNITY TEMPLE ON THE PLAZA$5,000
ACLU of Kansas$5,000
Ferris (Joyce) Esophageal Cancer Foundat$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY$5,000
Pet Resource Center$5,000
Haskell Indian University Foundation$5,000
Giving the Basics Inc$5,000
LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MISSOURI$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Pawsperity: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$680k · 24 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$680k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+123%

Still filing today

38%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsCrime & LegalEnvironmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM
    4× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +34%
  • TS
    THE SCHOOLHOUSE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +50% · 26% of their budget
  • PV
    PRAIRIE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • OP
    Overland Park Historical Society Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +600%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Morton County Historical Society Inc

Preservation of historical records and artifacts of morton county, kansas

2
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
3
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

4
Kansas Association of Conservation Districts

Engage in educational, scientific, and governmental efforts to conserve, develop, and improve the use of land, soil, water, plants, animals, and other natural resources within the state of kansas

Community Improvement
5
Franklin County Historical Society

To preserve, present and promote history in Franklin County, Kansas.

6
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
7
Hayslope Preservation Historic Fund

Public charity

8
Wichita-Sedgwick County Historical Museum Association

To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county

Arts & Culture
9
Leavenworth County Historical Society

The preservation of a victorian house which is a museum and repository for documents and artifacts of leavenworth county,kansas. the preservation of those documents and artifacts. education of historical significance and living history.

Arts & Culture
10
Friends of the Zoo of Kansas City Foundation

The foundation shall further educational and cultural programs relating to zoological activities, establish and maintain zoological facilities, provide for the acquisition and care of species for display and study, and engage in collateral…

Animals
11
Jefferson County Historical Society

To preserve, maintain and restore historical artifacts and information for future generations.

12
Kansas City Museum Foundation Inc

The kansas city museum foundation preserves, interprets, and celebrates kansas city through collections, exhibitions, and bold programs that reflect the city's evolution and spirit, and engage visitors in unfolding stories about kansas…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truman Heartland Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Save the Kc Neon Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%8%5–10yr16%8%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr12%31%35–55yr25%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr16%3%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr12%43%35–55yr25%35%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
1,081/8,397

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITY SCHOOL OF CHRISTIANITY — $135,000 · OtherUNITY SCHOOL OF CHRISTIANITYWILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM — $105,000 · OtherWILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAMSTATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF — $53,000 · OtherSTATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OFTHE SCHOOLHOUSE INC — $30,000 · OtherKCPT - KANSAS CITY PBS — $30,000 · OtherPRAIRIE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL FOUNDATION — $28,250 · OtherUNITY SOCIETY OF PRACTICAL CHRISTIANITY — $28,000 · OtherNORTHEAST KANSAS CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $20,000 · Other+26 more — $167,500 · Other+26 moreTRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $142,000 · PhilanthropyTRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY F…Greater Kansas City Community Foundation — $122,000 · PhilanthropyGreater Kansas City Communit…JACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $77,500 · Arts & CultureJACKSON COUN…Save the KC Neon Inc — $20,700 · Arts & CultureSave the KC …THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $8,500 · Arts & Culture+4 moreFRIENDS OF LAKESIDE NATURE CENTER INCORPORATED — $25,000 · EnvironmentLegal Aid of Western Missouri — $20,000 · Crime & LegalHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $16,000 · Food & NutritionOPERATION WILDLIFE INC — $5,000 · AnimalsGREAT PLAINS SPCA — $2,000 · AnimalsPAWSPERITY INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$596,750Philanthropy$264,000Arts & Culture$112,700Environment$25,000Crime & Legal$20,000Food & Nutrition$16,000Animals$7,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $142,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $122,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM — $105,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $77,500 over 3y, 33% of budgetTHE SCHOOLHOUSE INC — $30,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetPRAIRIE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL FOUNDATION — $28,250 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKESIDE NATURE CENTER INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetSave the KC Neon Inc — $20,700 over 2y, 17% of budgetLegal Aid of Western Missouri — $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetELMWOOD CEMETERY SOCIETY — $8,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KANSAS — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOverland Park Historical Society Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHISTORIC KANSAS CITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGREAT PLAINS SPCA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe William Rockhill Nelson Trust — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORNALL-MAJORS HOUSE MUSEUMS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUMAN HEARTLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation
  • Who funds WILD AND FREE WILDLIFE REHAB PROGRAM
  • Who funds JACKSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE SCHOOLHOUSE INC
  • Who funds PRAIRIE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LAKESIDE NATURE CENTER INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Save the KC Neon Inc
  • Who funds Legal Aid of Western Missouri
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
  • Who funds ELMWOOD CEMETERY SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPERATION WILDLIFE INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KANSAS
  • Who funds PAWSPERITY INC
  • Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC
  • Who funds WESTPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO25.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · The Atterbury Family Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Minnesota Prairie Wind Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph