Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Minkowitz Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$29kEducation$20kCrime & Legal$3kPhilanthropy$2kHealth$1kCommunity Improvement$475International$405Arts & Culture$283Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$75
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROOKLYN HEIGHTS SYNAGOGUE$4,000
BROOKLYN LOUIS SCHOOL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$400
WILLOWTOWN ASSOCIATION$75
THE SCHOMBURG CENTER FOR RESEARCH$50
CITY HARVEST$50
NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $75) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BROOKLYN COMMUNITY HOUSING SERVICES: $75 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$62k · 22 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
19

Total granted

$62k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+32%

Still filing today

55%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $17k · revenue +27%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2k · revenue +22%
  • Cornell University
    4× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • DR
    DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2018 · $150
  • CC
    COLUMBIA C FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $150
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $125 · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
6
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Landmarks Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is City Harvest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr21%14%20–35yr13%43%35–55yr10%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr21%1%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr10%61%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
12%
5,481/45,652

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BROOKLYN HEIGHTS SYNAGOGUE — $28,590 · OtherBROOKLYN HEIGHTS SYNAGOGUEIndividual grant recipient — $6,803 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNY BAR FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherNY BAR FOUNDATIONBROOKLYN LOUIS SCHOOL — $2,000 · Other+30 more — $3,404 · Other+30 moreBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL — $16,500 · EducationBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOLCornell University — $1,700 · EducationCornell UniversityUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $2,340 · PhilanthropySIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $141 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $125 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $108 · Arts & CultureHIAS INC — $208 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $125 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $36 · InternationalLEGAL SERVICES NYC — $200 · Crime & LegalCITY HARVEST INC — $150 · Food & Nutrition
Other$43,297Education$18,200Philanthropy$2,340Arts & Culture$374International$369Crime & Legal$200Food & Nutrition$150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL — $16,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $2,340 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $208 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES NYC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $141 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY HOUSING AND SERVICES — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $61 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $45 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $40 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HIAS INC
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES NYC
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
  • Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY HOUSING AND SERVICES
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Minkowitz Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Minkowitz Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Minkowitz Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph