How much did MILLRACE FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of MILLRACE FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$13,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

SAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY$14,000
ARDELLA'S HOUSE INC$14,000
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM$14,000
THE CITY SCHOOL$14,000
HISTORIC FAIRHILL INC$13,000
WEST PHILADELPHIA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN$11,000
THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF DREXEL UNIVERSITY$11,000
COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$10,000
THE SIMPLE WAY$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 15%. 68% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$601k · 12 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against -91% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$601k

$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%

-91%

Still filing today

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TC
THE CITY SCHOOL
9× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +58%
CV
COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE
9× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +129%
THE SIMPLE WAY
5× · 2021–2025 · $51k · revenue +114%

Funded once

TW
THE WISTAR INSTITUTE
one grant, 2020 · $125k
SS
SUNDAY SUPPERS
one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -91%
WP
WEST PHILA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN
one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Together for West Philadelphia

Together for West Philadelphia partners with healthcare systems community-based organizations, academic institutions, and public and private stakeholders to achieve equitable health outcomes for West Philadelphians.

Unclassified

Sharing Excess

Sharing Excess (SE) is a Philadelphia-based nonprofit that uses surplus food as a solution to scarcity. While over 40 million people in the US face food insecurity, nearly 40% of the nation's food supply is going to waste. Our mission is…

Food & Nutrition

The Common Place Inc

The Common Place is a nonprofit organization that provides holistic support to children and their families in Southwest Philadelphia through educational programs, food sovereignty, community collaboration, and welcome.

Youth Development

Project Home

The mission of project home is to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty in philadelphia.

Human Services

Simple Homes Fuller Center for Housing

creating dignified, affordable housing for low-income families in Philadelphia

—

Food Bank for New York City

The mission of food bank for new york city is to end hunger by organizing food, information and support for community survival and dignity.

Community Improvement

United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

End intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers.

Philanthropy

Common Market Philadelphia Inc

The organization is a non-profit that distributes local and sustainably produced foods. the organization's public purpose is to implement education programs that improve access to local foods for residents of underserved low income…

Human Services

Kids Against Hunger Philadelphia Inc

From 2019 to 2021 we partnered with Philabundance to provide all of the meals for their backpack program. We packed meals 7 days week all with the help of thousands of volunteers. Each backpack was filled with 4 different meals (24…

Food & Nutrition

Caring for Friends

Caring for friends, founded in 1974, is a food bank, prepared meals program, and caring kitchen. our mission is to provide food and friendship to seniors, kids and adults, the homeless, and those in shelter in greater philadelphia. we are…

Food & Nutrition

Cleveland Public Market Corporation

Under the direction of a committed board of directors, the nonprofit cleveland public market corporation ("cpmc") is seeking to make west side market the nation's premier public market by meeting the evolving needs of merchants, customers,…

Community Improvement

Greater Philadelphia Coalition

We strive to build a community where all people have the food they need to have healthy lives.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share Food Program and the most unlike its peers is The City School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/10

Grantees still filing

7/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$429,500Human Services$125,500Housing & Shelter$81,500Health$75,500Employment$20,500Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Leo and Peggy Pierce FamilyPA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MILLRACE FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WEST PHILADELPHIA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~15 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 201574860 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WEST PHILADELPHIA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 15 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Millrace Foundation Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Millrace Foundation Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MILLRACE FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Millrace Foundation Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

MILLRACE FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Millrace Foundation Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph