· Private foundation
Miller Ua Morey & Helen Schol
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $124k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT | $46,000 |
| CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY | $12,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAVEN | $9,000 |
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY | $9,000 |
| DARTMOUTH COLLEGE | $8,000 |
| AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE | $8,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO | $8,000 |
| ANNA MARIA COLLEGE | $8,000 |
| GETTYSBURG COLLEGE | $8,000 |
| ALBERTUS MAGNUS COLLEGE | $8,000 |
| LINCOLN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE | $8,000 |
| RUTGERS UNIVERSITY | $8,000 |
| MITCHELL COLLEGE | $8,000 |
| WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $6,000 |
| ENDICOTT COLLEGE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of New Haven5× · 2021–2025 · $67k · revenue +24%
UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD5× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +10%- WNWESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY4× · 2020–2023 · $36k · revenue +20%
Funded once
Rochester Institute of Technologygraduatedone grant, 2020 · $31k · revenue +38%
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue +22%
Rensselaer Polytechnic Instituteone grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.
Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacred Heart University Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is University of Saint Joseph. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of New Haven ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds WESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville University ↗
- Who funds MCPHS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds EMERSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds STONEHILL COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds MARIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds URSINUS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds University of New England ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
- Who funds GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ALBERTUS MAGNUS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MITCHELL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds American International College ↗
- Who funds GETTYSBURG COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Davis Educational Foundation · O'Meara Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · The George I Alden Trust · Council of Independent Colleges · Ibm International Foundation · Magraw a F-Marguerite Magraw Tr · Angela M Zampogna Scholarship Fund · Ralph & Helen Kelley Fdn · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Miller Ua Morey & Helen Schol funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University of Delaware — 25% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 6% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 4% of income from government
- Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc — 2% of income from government
- Georgian Court University — 2% of income from government
- University of New Haven — 1% of income from government
- Jacksonville University — 1% of income from government
- Bay Path University — 1% of income from government
- Albertus Magnus College — 1% of income from government
- The Sisters of Saint Ann Inc — 1% of income from government
- Mitchell College — 1% of income from government
- University of Saint Joseph — 1% of income from government
- Stonehill College Inc — 1% of income from government
- University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
- Mcphs University — 1% of income from government
- Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Curry College — 0% of income from government
- Seton Hall University — 0% of income from government
- Western New England University — 0% of income from government
- Champlain College Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Springfield College — 0% of income from government
- Endicott College — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- American International College — 0% of income from government
- Emmanuel College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.