Skip to content
Miller Family Foundation #2 at a glance

· Private foundation

Miller Family Foundation #2

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$390k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.5MHealth$1.3MEducation$211kYouth Development$141kArts & Culture$127kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $295k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DELTA PREVENTION$150,000
FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC$145,000
CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTI$45,000
T-MO ENTERTAINMENT INC$15,000
STRENGTHENING FAMILIES FOUNDATION - ORG$10,000
CROSSOVER AMERICA INC$10,000
FOLSOM-CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,000
CROSSOVER AMERICA INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $145k → 8%STRENGTHENING FAMILIES FOUNDATION - ORG: $10k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $145k → 8%STRENGTHENING FAMILIES FOUNDATION - ORG: $9k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $141k → 8%STRENGTHENING FAMILIES FOUNDATION - ORG: $3k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $131k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $131k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $66k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $66k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $66k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $66k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $66k → 8%HOPE CENTERS UNITED: $45k → 12%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $66k → 8%HOPE CENTERS UNITED: $45k → 12%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $65k → 8%HOPE CENTERS UNITED: $35k → 12%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $65k → 8%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $40k → 8%HOPE CENTERS UNITED: $8k → 12%FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC: $25k → 8%HOPE CENTERS UNITED: $5k → 12%HOPE CENTERS UNITED: $5k → 12%HOPE CENTERS UNITED: $5k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $150k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $140k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $140k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $129k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $64k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $64k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $64k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $33k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $32k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $32k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $32k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $32k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $32k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $25k → 12%DELTA PREVENTION: $2k → 12%CROSSOVER AMERICA INC: $10k → 12%CROSSOVER AMERICA INC: $5k → 12%SAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $15k → 12%SAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $15k → 12%SAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $13k → 12%SAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 15 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$3.2M
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+15%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +85%
  • CN
    CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTIONS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +24%
  • HC
    Hope Centers United
    6× · 2017–2024 · $148k · revenue +287% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • OY
    OMNI YOUTH PROGRAMS
    one grant, 2018 · $94k · revenue +15%
  • PM
    POWERHOUSE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • MI
    MULTIPLY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Family Centers Inc

To equip families with the tools they need to become self-sufficent members of the community.

Human Services
2
California Youth Services

We provide education, counseling, and intervention programs to support individuals and families facing substance abuse, behavioral, and mental health challenges. Our mission is to empower youth and fimilies with the skills, resources, and…

Human Services
3
Family Connections Inc

Growth happens here every day. with our counseling, skills-building, training and prevention services, people take control of their own healing and foster connections that make our entire community stronger, safer, and healthier.

Health
4
Family Resource Center Inc

Prevention services for trouble youth

Crime & Legal
5
Rise Up Reno Prevention Network

Creating healthier choices for children & youth in reno county through mentoring, substance use prevention, and strengthening families.

Youth Development
6
Center for Family Outreach Inc

The Center mission is to strengthen families by providing education, prevention and early intervention for the following:Substance use assessments and therapy, Emotional/mental health and wellbeing counselling,Conflict resolution and…

Youth Development
7
Community Partnership for Youth

Community partnership for youth (cpy) is a prevention program providing positive alternatives to gangs, drugs and violence while reinforcing individual strengths. our vision is to provide our youth with a safe, structured environment that…

Human Services
8
Henry County Prevention Coalition

Empowering the community through prevention, education, and leadership roles in reducing alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, and other harmful behaviors amoung our youth and families

Education
9
The Family Effect

To reduce addiction as a leading cause of family collapse and harm to children in south carolina.

Social Science
10
Core Connections Kids Learning Cent

Provides education program for families

Human Services
11
Peaceful Family Solutions Inc

Peaceful family solutions dba peaceful family oklahoma (pfo) offers free trauma-informed, age-appropriate, evidence-based, hope-centered programs through day camp and school-based models for children aged 4-18. a key component of the…

Human Services
12
Alcohol & Drug Abuse Council Deep East Texas

Drug abuse prevention and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Fathers and Families; the most unlike its peers is Folsom Cordova Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INC: $1,280,500 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INCDELTA PREVENTION: $972,564 · Human ServicesDELTA PREVENTIONHope Centers United: $148,300 · Human ServicesHope Centers United+3 more: $90,090 · Human ServicesNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND: $164,250 · OtherNATIONAL COUNC…OMNI YOUTH PROGRAMS: $93,750 · OtherOMNI YOUTH PRO…FOLSOM-CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $57,000 · OtherFOLSOM-CORDOVA…Individual grant recipient: $42,000 · OtherIndividual gra…T-MO ENTERTAINMENT INC: $30,000 · OtherT-MO ENTERTAIN…POWERHOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 · OtherPOWERHOUSE MIN…BEYOND THE VILLAGE INC: $17,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherCENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTIONS INC: $200,000 · HealthFOLSOM CORDOVA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $128,500 · EducationNATIONAL ACADEMIC YOUTH CORPS INC: $53,500 · EducationCenter for Fathers and Families: $43,500 · Arts & CultureCAMPUS LIFE CONNECTION: $25,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$2,491,454Other$439,000Health$200,000Education$182,000Arts & Culture$43,500Youth Development$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INC: $1,280,500 over 9y, 18% of budgetDELTA PREVENTION: $972,564 over 7y, 100% of budgetCENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTIONS INC: $200,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetHope Centers United: $148,300 over 6y, 29% of budgetFOLSOM CORDOVA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $128,500 over 6y, 96% of budgetOMNI YOUTH PROGRAMS: $93,750 over 1y, 21% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMIC YOUTH CORPS INC: $53,500 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $52,780 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Fathers and Families: $43,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCAMPUS LIFE CONNECTION: $25,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetStrengthening Families Foundation: $22,310 over 3y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope Centers United ↗
  • Who funds FOLSOM CORDOVA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMNI YOUTH PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMIC YOUTH CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds Center for Fathers and Families ↗
  • Who funds CAMPUS LIFE CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds Strengthening Families Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Crossover America Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Com…Sierra Health Foundat…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Enterprise Holdings F…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Miller Family Foundation #2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Miller Family Foundation #2. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Families First Parenting Program Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Miller Family Foundation #2’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home