· Private foundation
Miller Family Foundation #2
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $295k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DELTA PREVENTION | $150,000 |
| FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAMS INC | $145,000 |
| CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTI | $45,000 |
| T-MO ENTERTAINMENT INC | $15,000 |
| STRENGTHENING FAMILIES FOUNDATION - ORG | $10,000 |
| CROSSOVER AMERICA INC | $10,000 |
| FOLSOM-CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT | $10,000 |
| CROSSOVER AMERICA INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +85%
- CNCENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTIONS INC4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +24%
- HCHope Centers United6× · 2017–2024 · $148k · revenue +287% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
- OYOMNI YOUTH PROGRAMSone grant, 2018 · $94k · revenue +15%
- PMPOWERHOUSE MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $25k
- MIMULTIPLY INCone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To equip families with the tools they need to become self-sufficent members of the community.
We provide education, counseling, and intervention programs to support individuals and families facing substance abuse, behavioral, and mental health challenges. Our mission is to empower youth and fimilies with the skills, resources, and…
Growth happens here every day. with our counseling, skills-building, training and prevention services, people take control of their own healing and foster connections that make our entire community stronger, safer, and healthier.
Prevention services for trouble youth
Creating healthier choices for children & youth in reno county through mentoring, substance use prevention, and strengthening families.
The Center mission is to strengthen families by providing education, prevention and early intervention for the following:Substance use assessments and therapy, Emotional/mental health and wellbeing counselling,Conflict resolution and…
Community partnership for youth (cpy) is a prevention program providing positive alternatives to gangs, drugs and violence while reinforcing individual strengths. our vision is to provide our youth with a safe, structured environment that…
Empowering the community through prevention, education, and leadership roles in reducing alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, and other harmful behaviors amoung our youth and families
To reduce addiction as a leading cause of family collapse and harm to children in south carolina.
Provides education program for families
Peaceful family solutions dba peaceful family oklahoma (pfo) offers free trauma-informed, age-appropriate, evidence-based, hope-centered programs through day camp and school-based models for children aged 4-18. a key component of the…
Drug abuse prevention and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Fathers and Families and the most unlike its peers is Folsom Cordova Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds DELTA PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL NEBRASKA COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND ADDICTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Hope Centers United ↗
- Who funds FOLSOM CORDOVA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OMNI YOUTH PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMIC YOUTH CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE ↗
- Who funds Center for Fathers and Families ↗
- Who funds CAMPUS LIFE CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds Strengthening Families Foundation ↗
- Who funds Crossover America Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Miller Family Foundation #2 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Families First Parenting Program Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.